Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The fight to fully pervert society isn't finished....our fight must not be, either.
1 posted on 06/27/2013 4:48:04 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SoFloFreeper

Spiritual awakening is needed most... If that doesn’t happen, any victory by pro-family forces will be short-lived.


2 posted on 06/27/2013 4:51:41 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

It’s the taxpayers who will be getting sodomized.


3 posted on 06/27/2013 4:52:00 AM PDT by Daveinyork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper
SCOTUS rulings plus amnesty equals this:


4 posted on 06/27/2013 4:52:38 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper
RE :”Gay rights lobbyists plan to use their victory at the Supreme Court to push legislation that would ensure married same-sex couples are eligible for federal benefits in all 50 states”

That is going nowhere.

5 posted on 06/27/2013 4:58:52 AM PDT by sickoflibs (To GOP : Any path to US citizenship IS putting them ahead in line. Stop lying about your position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

They have two goals....money and your children.


6 posted on 06/27/2013 5:00:04 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

I believe they will get federal benefits in all 50 states, but it state benefits in all states. For example, in Virginia, they can put married on their federal income tax, but put single on their state income tax. In California, they will put married on both federal and state. Tax advisers are going to have to learn new laws.


9 posted on 06/27/2013 5:33:18 AM PDT by napscoordinator (Santorum-Bachmann 2016 for the future of the Country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

I expect we’ll soon see very public attempts to force the Catholic church to perform homosexual marriages.

Will we also see attempts to force mosques in New York City or Boston to perform similar marriage ceremonies?

We all know the answer, and we all know why.


10 posted on 06/27/2013 5:33:57 AM PDT by Steely Tom (If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

The greatest beneficiary of the successes of the homosexual agenda and the recent Supreme Court ruling may ultimately be Islam. Islam will not tolerate this sort of foolishness. Jihadis could reasonably conclude that all they need do is watch as the U.S.A. and Western Civilization commit suicide.


11 posted on 06/27/2013 6:03:50 AM PDT by Savage Beast (The forces of decadence are the forces of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper
to push legislation that would ensure married same-sex couples are eligible for federal benefits in all 50 states.

That sentence is a non-sequitur.

More proof that today's "journalists" are people who could not get into beauty school.


12 posted on 06/27/2013 6:20:17 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

As an employer, I would drop all family benefits rather than be compelled to provide “family” benefits to a pervert. At the first such demand (and they are demands, not requests), I would apologize and inform the entire staff that I had already decided to end all employee benefits to save on administrative costs, and that my contribution toward those benefits (plus the saved administrative costs) would be folded into future paychecks.

There is not much of a silver lining when we experiment with social rules that have never in the history of the world succeeded, but if this removes the entanglement between the religious sacrament of holy matrimony and the social constructs of employment law and civil law, that would reduce the damage. What gay man would bother with “marriage” if there was no money in it?


13 posted on 06/27/2013 6:41:47 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson