Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: firebrand
The Supreme Court may well have other ideas on this issue.

THIS SCOTUS? Really?

64 posted on 06/28/2013 1:24:18 PM PDT by markomalley (Nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good -- Leo XIII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: markomalley

See Jim Towey’s op-ed “Supremes’ Quiet Hit on Obamacare” in the June 26 New York Post. Namely, the Court ruled that the government cannot make aid contingent on an organization’s point of view. The point of view in this case was an organization’s stance pro or anti prostitution.

Hello. The same thing applies to ObamaCare. Never mind that the organization wanted the government to be against prostitution and not give aid to those who refused to forbid it, but the Court said you can’t do that. That would violate the 1st Amendment. Prostitution bad, abortifacients bad, but the principle is the same.

Well, we can hope. Opinion by the not-too-stupid Roberts.


84 posted on 06/28/2013 11:44:47 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson