Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Flood evacuees furious as RCMP enter locked homes to confiscate firearms.
Radio Canada International ^ | Friday 28 June, 2013 | Marc Montgomery

Posted on 06/28/2013 7:01:25 PM PDT by Candor7

High River ( Alberta, Canada) residents mill about an RCMP roadblock where much angry shouting was heard as police refused entry into the town. Residents were astounded to learn the police had broken into homes to confiscate firear

Residents of the previously flooded town of High River, are angry at delays in being allowed back in to the town.

The 13-thousand citizens were ordered out and the town completely evacuated during the flood, but as waters have receded, residents are eager to return home to assess the damage.

The RCMP has been refusing to let people back in as the evacuation stretched into its eighth day, causing a loud confrontation between about 30 officers and 50 residents at one of the roadblocks

When police laid a spike belt across the road, the crowd became even angrier.

“What’s next? Tear gas?” one resident shouted.

“It’s just like Nazi Germany, just taking orders,” shouted another.

RCMP youtube video shows police entering homes ostensibly looking for abandoned pets. Not shown is how they got in to the locked homes. Then they were further angered when they learned that members of Canada’s national police force, the RCMP, had been entering locked homes and confiscating firearms.

Sgt Brian Topham of the RCMP confirmed police had relied on forced entry to get into houses because of “urgent need”

On Thursday he told reporters that police had confiscated a “substantial “ number of firearms from residents homes.

“I find that absolutely incredible that they have the right to go into a person’s belongings out of their home,” said resident Brenda Lackey, after learning Mounties have been taking residents’ guns from their homes.

Sgt Topham added, ““We just want to make sure that all of those things are in a spot that we control, simply because of what they are,”

He said the guns will be returned to owners after residents are allowed back in town and they provide proof of ownership,

Civil liberties and firearms experts say that flood or no flood, emergency or not, police do not have the right to break into homes and confiscate property.

“This is without precedent, this is unreasonable search and seizure,” said Ed Burlew, lawyer and firearms specialist in Ontario. “The entry was illegal, it’s against the charter, it was unreasonable search and seizure. There’s no judge that would uphold the evidence obtained through an illegal entry into a person’s home.”

Commenting on the police actions, Alberta Premier Allison Redford said on Thursday, “These are exceptional circumstances, in an emergency situation we have to have our police ensuring that there is law and order,”

Andres McGrath, spokesman for the Ministry of Public Safety in the province said, “We have been advised that during the course of searching for individuals unable to make their way to safety, the RCMP discovered firearms that were insecurely stored. Those firearms will be held safely by the RCMP and will be returned to their owners as soon as possible.

There is no special provision in the Criminal Code that allows the police to enter the homes of gun owners during a time of an emergency,” said Solomon Friedman, lawyer and firearms specialist in Ottawa. “The firearms act is often used by police as a pretext to gain access to private residences that they would not be able to gain access to, the ironic thing here is that if these people were convicted paedophiles the police would not be allowed to enter their homes without warrant, it’s kind of sad that gun owners have to fight for the same rights as any convicted criminals.”

Friday, the Prime Minister’s Office waded into the controversy. PMO spokesman “ Carl Vallée said, “We expect that any firearms taken will be returned to their owners as soon as possible. We believe the RCMP should focus on more important tasks such as protecting lives and private property.


TOPICS: Canada; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: canada; confiscation; firearms; rcmp; tyranny; unwarranted
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: Candor7

One could easily believe the RCMP were selecting homes based on the national gun registration list.


41 posted on 06/29/2013 5:04:00 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
now that's hard truck for the 21st century!

and from days gone by...









42 posted on 06/29/2013 6:16:55 AM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

That’s right. And few Canadians realize it.When you have weapons in your home, regsitered , both restricted and non restricted, you have given the police the right to enter anytime without warrant.

This is a horrible state of affairs and incidents like this one raise the awareness of Canadians of how vulnerable “gun owners” are, and they should not be.


43 posted on 06/29/2013 7:18:56 AM PDT by Candor7 (Obama fascism article:(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: expat1000

Mehh~ “ We tried to notify them, couldn`t find them ,so we assumed consent.After all they have nothing to hide now do theyt” is what I expect to hear :

While Canadians have a right to protection only against ‘unreasonable’ intrusions upon their privacy, the provisions of Bill C-68 go beyond the bounds of reasonableness. The search and seizure powers granted by C-68 are unconstitutionally broad. They authorize police to enter into private homes “at any reasonable time” and to search “any place where the inspector believes . . . there is a gun collection or a record [of a gun collection]” and “may open any container . . . examine any other thing that the inspector finds and take samples of it”; and “require any person to produce for examination or copying any records books of account or other documents.” Such sweeping search powers violate the prohibition against police “fishing expeditions” imposed by the courts’ interpretation of the section

http://www.garrybreitkreuz.com/publications/violatescharterofrightsandfreedom.htm

.


44 posted on 06/29/2013 10:37:21 AM PDT by Para-Ord.45 (Happily in tutelage by the reflection that they have chosen their own guardians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson