Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court rejects bid to halt same-sex marriages in California (rejects emergency request)
LA Times ^ | June 30, 2013 | Maura Dolan

Posted on 06/30/2013 10:18:15 AM PDT by Innovative

The Supreme Court rejected an emergency request to stop same-sex marriages in California, a lawyer for the gay couples who sued said Sunday.

Theodore J. Boutrous Jr., one of the lawyers who challenged Proposition 8, said that he had just received word from the court Sunday morning that Justice Anthony M. Kennedy denied a request by ProtectMarriage, the sponsors of Proposition 8, to halt the marriages.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; court; faggots; fags; homos; homosexualagenda; lesbians; prop8; samesexmarriage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: Regulator

Actually that’s not quite accurate. There is no law. It is a court procedure. Big difference.

Also, the 9th Circuit was the one that issued the injunction, not SCOTUS. Technically, the 9th Circuit could have lifted it’s injunction at any time, even while the case was being heard. So the timing of when the 9th Circuit decides to lift it’s injunction has nothing to do with the 25 day period to ask for a re-hearing.

And let me be clear yet again. I am NOT siding with the Court’s decision in this matter. Just explaining the Procedure is all.


21 posted on 06/30/2013 11:47:03 AM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
Theodore J. Boutrous Jr., one of the lawyers who challenged Proposition 8, said that he had just received word from the court Sunday morning that Justice Anthony M. Kennedy denied a request by ProtectMarriage, the sponsors of Proposition 8, to halt the marriages.

Is this lawyer the only source? I can't find this at the Supreme Court website.

22 posted on 06/30/2013 12:06:53 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Entrepreneur

The argument the gay marriage supporters were making was that it’s not allowed to take away marriage once it was already granted, and the circuit court agreed with this. That’s why it applied to California only and not every state. However, it’s still a devastating blow to traditional marriage supporters. Why? It means every gain the gay marriage supporters make is permanent, whereas every gain we make is (at best) temporary.


23 posted on 06/30/2013 12:13:17 PM PDT by RB156
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Rome


24 posted on 06/30/2013 12:15:18 PM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

Here’s the Associated Press report:
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/06/supreme-court-gay-marriage-justice-kennedy-93598.html


25 posted on 06/30/2013 12:18:04 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Innovative; Perdogg; Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; TheOldLady; Spacetrucker; ...

FReepmail me or Perdogg to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

26 posted on 06/30/2013 12:35:30 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Worthless Courts system, time to forget the Supreme robed thieves and the corrupt Federal Gov. We need to get out of the damn Union!


27 posted on 06/30/2013 2:37:55 PM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

All news outfits are reporting it from AP to Reuters.


28 posted on 06/30/2013 4:52:17 PM PDT by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson