Posted on 06/30/2013 10:18:15 AM PDT by Innovative
Actually that’s not quite accurate. There is no law. It is a court procedure. Big difference.
Also, the 9th Circuit was the one that issued the injunction, not SCOTUS. Technically, the 9th Circuit could have lifted it’s injunction at any time, even while the case was being heard. So the timing of when the 9th Circuit decides to lift it’s injunction has nothing to do with the 25 day period to ask for a re-hearing.
And let me be clear yet again. I am NOT siding with the Court’s decision in this matter. Just explaining the Procedure is all.
Is this lawyer the only source? I can't find this at the Supreme Court website.
The argument the gay marriage supporters were making was that it’s not allowed to take away marriage once it was already granted, and the circuit court agreed with this. That’s why it applied to California only and not every state. However, it’s still a devastating blow to traditional marriage supporters. Why? It means every gain the gay marriage supporters make is permanent, whereas every gain we make is (at best) temporary.
Rome
Here’s the Associated Press report:
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/06/supreme-court-gay-marriage-justice-kennedy-93598.html
FReepmail me or Perdogg to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
Worthless Courts system, time to forget the Supreme robed thieves and the corrupt Federal Gov. We need to get out of the damn Union!
All news outfits are reporting it from AP to Reuters.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.