Posted on 07/01/2013 5:51:32 PM PDT by lbryce
Did you know that U.S. banks have more than 1.8 trillion dollars parked at the Federal Reserve and that the Fed is actually paying them not to lend that money to us?
We were always told that the goal of quantitative easing was to "help the economy", but the truth is that the vast majority of the money that the Fed has created through quantitative easing has not even gotten into the system. Instead, most of it is sitting at the Fed slowly earning interest for the bankers.
Back in October 2008, just as the last financial crisis was starting, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke announced that the Federal Reserve would start paying interest on the reserves that banks keep at the Fed. This caused an absolute explosion in the size of these reserves. Back in 2008, U.S. banks had less than 2 billion dollars of excess reserves parked at the Fed. Today, they have more than 1.8 trillion.
In less than five years, the pile of excess reserves has gotten nearly 1,000 times larger. This is utter insanity, and it will have very serious consequences down the road.
Posted below is a chart that shows the explosive growth of these excess reserves in recent years...
Excess Reserves
This explains why all of the crazy money printing that the Fed has been doing has not caused tremendous inflation yet. Most of the money has not even gotten into the economy. The Fed has been paying banks not to lend it out.
But now that big pile of money is sitting out there, and at some point it is going to come pouring in to the U.S. economy. When that happens, we could very well see an absolutely massive tsunami of inflation.
Posted below is a chart that shows the growth of the M2 money supply over the past several decades. It has been fairly steady, but imagine what would happen if you took the hockey stick from the chart above and suddenly added it to the top of this one...
M2 Money Supply
The longer that the Federal Reserve continues to engage in quantitative easing and continues to pay banks not to lend that money out to the rest of us, the larger that inflationary time bomb is going to become.
In a recent article for the Huffington Post, Professor Robert Auerbach of the University of Texas explained the nightmarish situation that we are facing...
One reason that the excess reserves grew to an extraordinary level is that in October 2008, one month after the financial crisis when Lehman Brothers went bankrupt, the Bernanke Fed began paying interest on bank reserves. Although it has been 1/4 of 1 percent interest, this risk free rate was not low compared to the Fed's policy of keeping short-term market rates near zero. The interest banks received was and is an incentive to hold the excess reserves rather than lend to consumers and businesses in the risky environment of the major recession and the slow recovery.
The Bernanke Fed is now facing a $1.863 trillion time bomb, they helped to create, of excess reserves in the private banking system. If rates of interest on income earning assets (including bank loans to consumers and businesses) rise, the Fed will have to pay the banks more interest to hold their excess reserves.
If interest rates move up dramatically (and they are already starting to rise significantly), banks will have an incentive to take that money out of the Fed and start lending it out. Professor Auerbach suggests that this could cause an "avalanche" of money pouring into the economy...
Eighty five billion a month will seem tiny compared to the avalanche of the $1.863 trillion excess reserves exploding rapidly into the economy. That would devalue the currency, cause more rapid inflation and worry investors about a coming collapse.
So the Fed has kind of painted itself into a corner. If the Fed keeps printing money, they continue to grossly distort our financial system even more and the excess reserves time bomb just keeps getting bigger and bigger.
But even the suggestion that the Fed would begin to start "tapering" quantitative easing caused the financial markets to throw an epic temper tantrum in recent weeks. Interest rates immediately began to skyrocket and Fed officials did their best to try to settle everyone down.
So where do we go from here?
Unfortunately, as Jim Rogers recently explained, this massive experiment in financial manipulation is ultimately going to end in disaster...
Im afraid that in the end, were all going to suffer perhaps, worse than we ever have, with inflation, currency turmoil, and higher interest rates.
The Fed and other global central banks have created the largest bond bubble in the history of the planet. If the Fed ends quantitative easing, the bond market is going to try to revert to normal.
That would be disastrous for the global financial system. The following is what Jim Willie told Greg Hunter of USAWatchdog.com...
Everything is dependent on Fed support. They know if they take it away, theyre going to create a black hole. The Treasury bond is the greatest asset bubble in history. Its at least twice as large as the housing and mortgage bubble, maybe three or four times as large.
But even if the central banks keep printing money, they may not be able to maintain control over the bond market. In fact, there are already signs that they are starting to lose control. The following is what billionaire Eric Sprott told King World News the other day...
Its total orchestration. And its orchestration because they might have lost control of the bond market. I find it such a juxtaposition that central banks on a daily basis buy more bonds today than they ever purchased, and interest rates are going up, which is almost perverted. I mean how can that happen?
Theyve lost control of the market in my mind, and thats why they are so desperately trying to get us all to forget the word taper. In fact, we probably wont even hear the word taper anymore because it has such a sickening reaction to people in the bond market, and perhaps even people in the stock market. They will probably do away with the word. But the system is totally out of control. And then weve got this quadrillion dollars of derivatives. It just blows blows my mind to think about what could really be going on behind the scenes.
Sprott made a really good point about derivatives.
The quadrillion dollar derivatives bubble could bring down the global financial system at any time.
And remember, interest rate derivatives make up the biggest chunk of that. Today, there are 441 trillion dollars of interest rate derivatives sitting out there. If interest rates begin skyrocketing at some point, that is going to create some absolutely massive losses in the system. We could potentially be talking about an event that would make the failure of Lehman Brothers look like a Sunday picnic.
We are moving into a time of great financial instability. People are going to be absolutely shocked by what happens.
Our financial system is a house of cards built on a foundation of risk, leverage and debt. When it all comes tumbling down, it should not be a surprise to any of us.
Our financial system is a house of cards built on a foundation of risk, leverage and debt. When it all comes tumbling down, it should not be a surprise to any of us.
Obama gets to laugh harder each consecutive day.
bump
I’ve been wanting a big piece of this action for a number of years now.
This is all by design and playing out exactly as planned. Beware of what is “waiting in the wings” in the form of a “rescue package” after the inevitable collapse occurs.
Prior to a few years ago, people calling into talk shows with conspiracy stories about the Federal Reserve manipulating the money supply and affecting the economy for their own nefarious purposes were relegated to kookville, and didn’t get much airtime except on shows like Coast to Coast or Alex Jones. They’re now looking a bit vindicated.
The Federal Reserve (a consortium of international bankers) decided to authorize paying interest on the money kept in international banks (their banks, specifically), with US taxpayers the source of the funds to pay the interest.
Is that right ?
Total enslavement to our new Socialist Masters ?
I am glad the banks are getting interest for their money they aren’t paying out Shyt for mine.
Why should banks take the risk of making loans when the interest they can earn from them is so low? Better to keep the money for themselves, and charge fees for everything to generate profits.
We would have had massive inflation if all that money was actually put into use.
anyone who understood what happened in the market from June 20th when the Fed said they would start to pull back then the market tanked, through Tuesday 6/25, when the GDP forecast came in much lower than expected and the market rejoiced thinking the Feds would continue with its stimulus, understands what a joke this economy is....
True but no way would the money be “released” into the economy. Just will not happen because they know the results. The Fed is stuck in QE mode from now into eternity or credit default which ever comes first.
Bad news is good news since the FEDS will step up and buy buy buy, absolutely illogical. But who wants to bet against the Fed.
No, the interest is from printed or created money.
It’s a scheme to prop up banks favored by the Fed.
However, taxpayers pay interest on the National Debt. But the National Debt is a small in relation to the Fed Debt.
I am not sure I agree that a currency devaluation will ensue if the trillions in reserve are released, as long as they are released into domestic circulation.
It’s no longer the case that inflation is defined as too many dollars chasing too few goods. It’s more the case that the dollar is the de facto currency of international exchange. Ex: Fuji apple exports are not going to demand more dollars and thereby risk losing market share. The dollar controls the international markets; prices are pegged to it.
As long as the dollar effect does not penetrate the local currency market where for example the Fuji apple exporters use Yen to pay labor, local utilities, taxes etc., then it matters not how many dollars are in circulation. It is the firewalls between local markets and international markets that determine the value of the US dollar to the local currency.
BS. Banks are not purposefully avoiding getting 3-7% percent so they can get .25%. That’s preposterous. Less pepople can qualify because of Obama’s crap economy. However banks would prefer to loan the money out and do loan it out.
So I reject that part of the article. The end resuult is the same. When they no longer want the cushion the money will circulate and increase inflation — which we’ve all known about.
Most people do not realize that even with those reserves none of the big money center banks are solvent under the gaap accounting principles in use prior to the financial crisis. The fed and their minions have given them regulatory forbearance which allows them to open their doors on a daily basis. If the had to do true mark to market instead of the mark to model being allowed now then we would not have a banking system today.
Here is the "money shot"!
FOOD SHORTAGE COMING AS FARMERS STRUGGLE
... "Things are getting worse. Many farmers cant get loans to buy fertilizer now, even though we have big shortages developing " ...
I like this guy, he's funny!
the vast majority of the money that the Fed has created through quantitative easing has not even gotten into the system. Instead, most of it is sitting at the Fed slowly earning interest for the bankers.
Yes, slowly. Much more slowly than the bonds the banks used to own that had a yield of 3%-5%. Yeah, the banks really made out on those sales. LOL!
The interest banks received was and is an incentive to hold the excess reserves rather than lend to consumers and businesses in the risky environment of the major recession and the slow recovery.
Yeah, 0.25% is an incentive, LOL!
If interest rates move up dramatically (and they are already starting to rise significantly), banks will have an incentive to take that money out of the Fed and start lending it out.
They'll only lend if their capital levels are high enough and the loans aren't too risky.
Yes the Federal Reserve (owned by the US gov) decided to pay interest on money held at the Fed (not held at international banks).
with US taxpayers the source of the funds to pay the interest. Is that right ?
No, that's wrong, the Fed pays the Treasury, not the other way around.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.