This is ABSURD. The state trying to get the officer’s testimony about Z’s credibility negated with the jury... just because he testified positively for Zimmerman.
It’s damaging enough that Bernie wants it out of there.
You can’t unring a bell, though..and he is wanting it rerung with the instructions to the jury.
That admission was the fat lady singing.
The persecution has no choice but to try to erase the tune.
>> The state trying to get the officer’s testimony about Z’s credibility negated with the jury...
Good luck with that! Even if the judge agrees. All an attempt to “negate” it will do is **reinforce** it.
Please don’t feed the troll. It has been reduced to replying to itself. Just ignore it.
BDLR did not object to the question. He now wants to strike the answer.
He waived the State’s objection by failing to object. Now he wants the judge to strike the answer.
I get the feeling the judge is going to grant the motion. She is all in for the prosecution.
This is ABSURD. The state trying to get the officer’s testimony about Z’s credibility negated with the jury... just because he testified positively for Zimmerman.