Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prosecutors in Zimmerman Trial Ask Jury to Disregard Comments (Too favorable towards Zimmerman)
The New York Times ^ | July 2, 2013 | Cara Buckley

Posted on 07/02/2013 3:53:36 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

SANFORD, Fla. — Prosecutors in the second-degree murder trial of George Zimmerman scrambled Tuesday to undo damage to their case by one of their leading witnesses, a Sanford police officer who interviewed the defendant hours after he fatally shot Trayvon Martin.

The witness, Officer Chris Serino, testified under cross-examination on late Monday afternoon that Mr. Zimmerman seemed to be telling the truth when he said he had fired his gun in self-defense. The officer’s admission made for a dramatic moment in the trial — and was a clear boon for the defense — but drew no immediate objection from the state. The court recessed for the day afterward.

But early on Tuesday, citing case law, the state successfully argued that Officer Serino’s comments about Mr. Zimmerman’s veracity ought to be disregarded by the jury. The judge then instructed the jurors, who are being sequestered during the trial, to ignore the officer’s statement, nearly 17 hours after it had been made.

Officer Serino’s testimony, in the second week of the trial in Seminole County Court, was the latest setback for prosecutors......

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: chrisserino; florida; railroaded; trayvon; zimmerman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-145 last
To: uncommonsense
-- no one could deny that Zimmerman was in serious trouble! --

And that's before the state of Florida decided to ruin his life.

141 posted on 07/03/2013 12:07:51 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Williams

I haven’t seen the ruling. I’m not sure what he was thinking. Perhaps he believes the Detective is providing an opinion prevented according to law. That seems a strange concept, but there are times when the law does come down on things a little different than what we would expect.

I’m not sure you are off base here. It may be a good point to use during an appeal.


142 posted on 07/03/2013 1:51:55 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Breaking News: Hillary not running in 2016. Brain tumor found during recent colonoscopy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Ping...


143 posted on 07/04/2013 3:30:39 AM PDT by BigCinBigD (...Was that okay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams
Keep in mind this “mistake” may be by the judge and could result in the successful appeal of a Z conviction.

One of many. The other day the judge told defense counsel they had five minutes to finish their re-cross examination of a witness.

144 posted on 07/05/2013 4:15:33 AM PDT by mac_truck ( Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

TrayBama:

When Zimmerman is acquitted, all the TrayBama sympathizers are going to hit the streets and riot like there’s no tomorrow.

The ugly side of the race baiters will backfire on them.

Bring it on!


145 posted on 07/07/2013 2:36:28 PM PDT by AlanGreenSpam (Obama: The First 'American IDOL' President - sponsored by Chicago NeoCom Thugs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-145 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson