I don't think so. On the one hand women tend to be much less inclined to take such drastic
measures and, on the other hand, when they do attack it is on a personal level that is incredibly deep. This is one of the fundamental differences between men and women: a man can get in a knock-down-drag-out fight with another guy... and then offer him a drink, I have never heard of the same with women.
Boy I have been keeping my powder dry on this one...
Well, if I were President…
Cannot a POTUS command troops for 90 days without Congresses Approval and not needing a declaration of war or an authorization of force?
The better question is what would happen if a general did it without specific orders to do so?
On the one hand he is sworn to the Constitution, which mandates protection from invasion, and any order contrary would therefore be illegal. But the politicians would not see it that way and would give every reason they could think of to condemn/discredit the action. [see here.]
“I can see a woman of steel I can think of do this, not comrade Oboingo”
Shark, I think taildragger is talking about Sarah Palin, not some unknown “woman” in general.
Take the words of context - not just a woman, but “of steel I can think of”.
Already established it’s somebody in particular he is aware of and she is made of steel.
So writing about women in general, in response to his post, misses his point.
(I think...)