It never ends!
To: sheikdetailfeather
I heard that the cousin of one of the jurors OWNS A GUN.
2 posted on
07/18/2013 4:28:58 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Who knew that one day professional wrestling would be less fake than professional journalism?)
To: sheikdetailfeather
This is beyond ridiculous.
3 posted on
07/18/2013 4:29:34 PM PDT by
Red in Blue PA
(When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
To: sheikdetailfeather
If anything, a family member would “tip off” the threats of violence, rumors of riots and riot plans by LEOs
So if there was anything said, anything to be tainted, it would have been anti GZ.
4 posted on
07/18/2013 4:30:25 PM PDT by
A_Former_Democrat
(LEAVE THE ZIMMERMANS ALONE . . . NOT guilty . . .you LOST Now SHUT UP)
To: sheikdetailfeather
As long as the jurors toed the line, they got pedicures.
To: sheikdetailfeather
Channel 9's Kathi Belich confirmed the jurors were left unsupervised with guests at times, which WFTV legal analyst Bill Sheaffer said is more than enough time for a member to have said something that could have influenced a juror and possibly impacted the verdict. [eyeroll] Yeah, the fiasco staged by the prosecution could NEVER have been enough to convince them to vote for acquittal. In fact, given all the pertinent information the state conspired to keep from the jurors, I'd argue that in this case, outside information leaking in would no doubt be of BENEFIT.
7 posted on
07/18/2013 4:40:40 PM PDT by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: sheikdetailfeather
At first I thought this meant “alone time” with the Martin family. Frankly, it wouldn’t surprise me.
8 posted on
07/18/2013 4:42:51 PM PDT by
867V309
To: sheikdetailfeather
It’s the accused who has a right to a speedy trial and a jury. The actual jurors don’t have to be locked away in dadgum isolation chambers throughout the trial.
Good grief, the straw grabbing going on after this verdict. They’ve got enough broken straw to fulfill straw man agitation propaganda needs for the next five years.
11 posted on
07/18/2013 4:50:04 PM PDT by
The KG9 Kid
(Demand Common Sense Nut Control.)
To: sheikdetailfeather
MEdia trying to gin up a mistrial decision? At least trying to cast doubt on the verdict.
A**holes.
12 posted on
07/18/2013 4:52:20 PM PDT by
skeeter
To: sheikdetailfeather
They will do anything and say anything to undermine the rule of law.
To: sheikdetailfeather
One of the jurors liked black licorice candy when she was a kid.
14 posted on
07/18/2013 5:01:07 PM PDT by
Iron Munro
(They Old. That's Old School People. We In A New School, Our Generation)
To: sheikdetailfeather
It was once said that “Hell hath no fury, like a woman scorned.”.
That goes double for racist blacks who didn’t get the verdict they wanted in the Zimmerman trial.
A trial that never should have been.
They are determined to win one way or another.
Zimmerman should leave this country and find one with no treaty to return those wanted by the US. Obama and his Negro flunkies in the Justice Department aren’t about to give up on this. The law means nothing to them, they twist it to serve their purpose. This is the new America, and some of us saw it coming.
15 posted on
07/18/2013 5:29:14 PM PDT by
Venturer
To: sheikdetailfeather
Bill Schaeffer must be familiar with this....he was pro-Zimmerman the first couple of days into the trial....then became pro-Trayvon as the evidence clearly showed Trayvon was the assaulter.
Schaeffer got talked to by someone during the trial. It was obvious to all covering and following the trial
16 posted on
07/18/2013 5:36:09 PM PDT by
SeminoleCounty
(Take a Stand, Take a Stand, Take a Stand Against The Black Ku Klux Klan)
To: sheikdetailfeather
I would consider a month away from my family a nice vacation.
17 posted on
07/18/2013 5:41:33 PM PDT by
beandog
(All Aboard the Choo Choo Train to Crazy Town)
To: sheikdetailfeather
Channel 9's Kathi Belich confirmed the jurors were left unsupervised with guests at times, which WFTV legal analyst Bill Sheaffer... On the other hand, I wouldn't allow Kathi Belich or Bill Sheaffer unsupervised with my neighbors dog.
19 posted on
07/18/2013 5:52:52 PM PDT by
Navy Patriot
(Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
To: sheikdetailfeather
. . . and who wanted the jury sequestered? Why, I believe it was the defense.
21 posted on
07/19/2013 2:00:44 AM PDT by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(“Liberalism” is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
To: sheikdetailfeather
These jokers probably resented the jury sequester when it reduced their potential audience by 6 (plus alternates) people.
And did not allow them to talk directly to the jurors to influence the verdict.
22 posted on
07/19/2013 2:09:08 AM PDT by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(“Liberalism” is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
To: sheikdetailfeather
Demonizing everyone but the thug and those who grew him...
23 posted on
07/19/2013 3:06:56 AM PDT by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
To: sheikdetailfeather
Sheesh. . .and each juror was asked if they went on-line or read about the case between courtroom sessions. . .so. . . big deal.
24 posted on
07/19/2013 7:13:49 AM PDT by
Hulka
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson