Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study finds fracking chemicals didn't pollute water
Associated Press ^ | July 19, 2013, 5:41 AM

Posted on 07/19/2013 10:28:12 PM PDT by newzjunkey

A landmark federal study on hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, shows no evidence that chemicals from the natural gas drilling process moved up to contaminate drinking water aquifers at a western Pennsylvania drilling site, the Department of Energy told The Associated Press.

After a year of monitoring, the researchers found that the chemical-laced fluids used to free gas trapped deep below the surface stayed thousands of feet below the shallower areas that supply drinking water, geologist Richard Hammack said...

The DOE team will start to publish full results of the tests over the next few months, said Hammack, who called the large amount of field data from the study "the real deal."

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: carbontax; energy; fracking; green; kenyanbornmuzzie; naturalgass; opec; pennsylvania; richardhammac; richardhammack
No surprise the comments call it a sham study, etc., etc. It's preliminary but important none-the-less.
1 posted on 07/19/2013 10:28:12 PM PDT by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

It won’t penetrate the rind of the watermelons. Nothing does once they decide something.


2 posted on 07/19/2013 11:07:14 PM PDT by volunbeer (We must embrace austerity or austerity will embrace us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Good post. Thanks.


3 posted on 07/19/2013 11:13:33 PM PDT by Eagles6 (Valley Forge Redux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Interesting fracking study.


4 posted on 07/19/2013 11:54:31 PM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Anybody thats in the business knows just how rediculous these claims of fracing contaminating underground water sources really is. The claims of methane contamination are just as rediculous, methanes been seeping up from the ground long before drilling or even people were around.


5 posted on 07/20/2013 2:53:22 AM PDT by Dusty Road
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

It’s an actual study, instead of being “we know it does these things because we’re against it” fakes. Thanks newzjunkey.


6 posted on 07/20/2013 5:27:32 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (McCain or Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

The left is impervious to the truth; facts are meaningless.


7 posted on 07/20/2013 8:54:23 AM PDT by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

I hear crickets churping. When will New York drop their ban?


8 posted on 07/26/2013 12:27:13 PM PDT by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson