Posted on 07/23/2013 3:02:10 PM PDT by Nachum
You got me without reading the whole article. These DC judges are out of their jurisdiction in deciding what city placed on their birth certificates. Their decision here doesn't carry much weight outside the Fed government. Hey, I hear Hawaii will issue birth certificate to anyone and anything plus kumquats. Heh
Besides, they could travel to Israel and load up on reams of city of Jerusalem, Israeli birth certificates.
The article is a bit confused here. An American citizen (or U.S.- Israeli dual citizen) born in Jerusalem gets a birth certificate, which is issued by Israel and will list the place of birth as Jerusalem, Israel. U.S. law has nothing to do with this. When that child's parents go to the U.S. Embassy to have the child's birth recorded under U.S. law, to establish the child's U.S. citizenship, they do not get a birth certificate; they get a U.S. passport or similar U.S. consular document, which will say that the child is a U.S. citizen born in "Jerusalem."
I see, my passport says Texas or Waco, Texas, so I see perhaps there is no issue here. If for example Texas left the Union or Mexico conquered Texas, my US passport would still what it says now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.