Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA starts building faster-than-light warp engine
rt.com ^ | 7/24/13 | Rt.com

Posted on 07/24/2013 11:36:33 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda

NASA starts building faster-than-light warp engine Get short URL Published time: July 23, 2013 19:06 Edited time: July 24, 2013 14:39

Researchers at NASA’s Texas-based Johnson Space Center are trying to prove that it is possible to travel faster than the speed of light, and hope to one day build an engine that resembles the fictional Starship Enterprise.

NASA physicist and engineer Dr. Harold G. White, 43, believes it is possible to bend the rules of time and space that Albert Einstein constructed when he postulated that it is impossible to exceed the speed of light.

White's research is based on the theories of Mexican physicist Miguel Alcubierre, who in 1994 theorized that exceeding Einstein’s galactic speed limit was possible if scientists discovered a way to harness the expansion and contraction of space. And Harold and his team are trying to do just that.

(Excerpt) Read more at rt.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nasa; warpdrive
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-167 next last
To: from occupied ga

So? I couldn’t care less if you agree with it.


121 posted on 07/25/2013 6:44:33 AM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda
That would be a bitch to test.
122 posted on 07/25/2013 6:46:21 AM PDT by McGruff (I need a new party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
What they are doing is building a device to research how to alter the trajectory of photons in certain ways...

That's like saying the Mona Lisa was just some dudes color photo...

If they can prove the theory on the small scale, the rest is just an engineering problem.

The numbers work. Latest research says it may not even need as much energy to initiate a "warp envelope" as previously thought. Instead of the amount of energy in a mass the size of Jupiter, we're down to asteroid sized mass/energy requirements. Still not feasible at current tech-level, but not as fanciful as it once was.

123 posted on 07/25/2013 6:53:45 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (I will not comply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
Can’t we solve global warming before we control space time?

Done.

Now... Back to building space ships...

124 posted on 07/25/2013 6:55:20 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (I will not comply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
Everything NASA does is a "boondoggle". They aren't supposed to exist as a Federal Agency. At least, my copy of Art 1 Sec8 doesn't mention them at all.

Until we get them cut completely, I'd rather the Feds were doing this rather than sending fighter jets to Muslim extremists or adding more sub-Departments to the BATFE.

125 posted on 07/25/2013 6:58:24 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (I will not comply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

If you don’t want people to agree or disagree then don’t post your opinions. I was simply pointing out that you’re wrong.


126 posted on 07/25/2013 7:05:09 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Are the only two choices doing this or sending fighter jets to wack jobs who hate the usa? How about doing neither and TAXING LESS and spending less. Something that neither the Republicans or Democrats want to do.


127 posted on 07/25/2013 7:07:30 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

Things like this are only impossible until someone figures out how to do it.

In an Alcubeirre warp-drive, your ship is subjectively sub-light. Warping the space-time around the ship causes the apparent movement. Space-time being essentially mass-less, the Einsteinian “speed of light in a vacuum” doesn’t come into play.


128 posted on 07/25/2013 7:10:37 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (I will not comply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
Something that neither the Republicans or Democrats want to do.

Ok... You just answered your own question. It'd be easier to warp space-time than to change Congress.

129 posted on 07/25/2013 7:12:38 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (I will not comply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
Things like this are only impossible until someone figures out how to do it.

Fallacious reasoning shared by some others on this thread. Some things are simply impossible given the nature of the universe. Finding "unknown elements" somewhere out in space is impossible. Violating either the first or second laws of thermodynamics is impossible. Exceeding the speed of light is impossible.

130 posted on 07/25/2013 7:35:28 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

Einstein’s speed limit is for communicating as we presently do it, because photons are the mediator of electromagnetic energy as we understand it. Your assertion of ‘impossible’ is, well, silly. The poster posited the ‘so far’ and you made an assertion that you cannot guarantee so don’t use ‘impossible’ unless you too are prepared to use the qualifier.


131 posted on 07/25/2013 7:39:00 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
"We probably already have these..."

No doubt:


132 posted on 07/25/2013 7:44:00 AM PDT by PLMerite (Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
Some things are simply impossible given the nature of the universe.

Agreed. And some rather surprisings things are very possible.

This could very well be one of those things.

Again, just because you can't see how this can be done, doesn't mean it won't work.

133 posted on 07/25/2013 7:56:36 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (I will not comply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Man I sure hope it works. I want either me and most conservatives or all of the liberals on the first flights out of here. I don’t really care which, but one of us has GOT to have some relief.

I think it had better be us though, because they definitely can’t survive for long on their own.


134 posted on 07/25/2013 8:28:58 AM PDT by Have Ruck - Will Travel (It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: VAFreedom
scientific advancement is linear is small steps... we can’t just jump to warp technology with out discoveries in between.

Consider that the time span between the first Wright Brothers flight (1903) to the first jet fighter (Me-262, first flight 1942), was less than 40 years. Things can advance rapidly once a breakthrough has been made.

135 posted on 07/25/2013 8:34:46 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1
I've tried to imagine what it would be like to bring an 19th century inventor to present time. Put him in the passenger seat of my truck and go for a 75 MPH ride down the highway at night with the air conditioner blowing and the radio blasting music.

Consider that if you brought somebody from 1 AD to George Washington's time, he would not see a huge difference in lifestyle. Horses still dragged carts. Ships still moved by wind-power. People still heated their houses with burning wood. Gunpowder would be a big change, but what else beyond that?

Now, bring somebody from 1776 up to 2013, and he would think he was in a world of magic.

136 posted on 07/25/2013 8:42:23 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Have Ruck - Will Travel
First flights should be crewed entirely by liberals. We'll send 'em in that ----> direction.

The rest of us will head off that'a'way <-----

137 posted on 07/25/2013 8:56:13 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (I will not comply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
They are not "building" any kind of "engine" or propulsion device at all -- which the headline implies. They are building a research device to study the physics. I didn't claim the research had no value. I merely stated that the headline was so far off from what is being done here as to be laughable.

I stand by my statement: What they are doing is building a device to research how to alter the trajectory of photons in certain ways...

138 posted on 07/25/2013 9:51:31 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (My tagline is in the shop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: newfreep
“If you are in a spaceship that is traveling at the speed of light, and you turn on the headlights, does anything happen?” - Stephen Wright

Ahh, yes. The paradox concerning the speed of light. If you are traveling in a bus at 50 MPH and you throw a baseball from the back of the bus to the front of the bus at 50 MPH, how fast was the baseball traveling? It depends on where you made the observation from.

Why doesn't this apply to the speed of light?

We are on a planet that is in motion revolving around a star that is also in motion in a galaxy that is in motion. We observe light that is emanating from stars that are in motion likely in directions not synonymous with ours. What have we really used to measure the speed of light and how can we be sure that is constant. Consider that we are measuring distances using the constant that we have established here in our solar system from one point to another where all variables are known. Then we have applied that which we have called a constant to everything from the size of the universe and our galaxy to how close the nearest star outside our solar system is.

I believe the best constant we may presume is how fast photons move from the source. I speculate the speed of a photon through a vacuum might change relative to the motion of its source depending on where the observation is made. Theoretically, if a star were moving at the speed of light in one direction, light would never be seen by any object traveling in a direction opposite the source. Light would not "travel" at all.

How much do we really know? Have we really found the edge of our Universe, or just the end of observable light?

139 posted on 07/25/2013 9:52:23 AM PDT by Tenacious 1 (If the government told us to expect rain, I'd schedule an outdoor wedding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

As you approach the speed of light, time (as we know it on earth) slows down. The GPS satellites actually prove that speed and time are relative. Some think that time stops (as we know it as observed from outside the travel) at the speed of light. A person traveling through space at the speed of light would arrive back to his starting spot at the same time (or however long it took for light to travel to and fro). But, depending on how far the traveler went, years or decades could have passed between the two events for those observing the event at the starting and finishing points.


140 posted on 07/25/2013 9:58:17 AM PDT by Tenacious 1 (If the government told us to expect rain, I'd schedule an outdoor wedding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-167 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson