Skip to comments.Why won't the media cover Huma Abedin's ties to the global jihad movement?
Posted on 07/26/2013 7:42:46 AM PDT by yoe
Why won't the media cover Huma Abedin's ties to the global jihad movement?
perpetuating what is, in fact, the great Huma Abedin cover-up
[snip] Everyone knows (too much) about the exposure part: Anthony Weiner, candidate for mayor of New York City, turns out to be a recidivist pervert. The fatuous conversation that has followed this "news" has turned on the decision of Weiner's wife, Huma Abedin, to step forward to try to salvage her husband's bid for public office. The Wall Street Journal's response to Abedin's decision was typical: "Watching the elegant Huma Abedin stand next to her man Tuesday as he explained his latest sexually charged online exchanges was painful for a normal human being to watch."
The media want to know why the "elegant Huma" -- Hillary Clinton's longtime aide and former deputy chief of staff -- would do such an inelegant thing.
[snip] It is not enough to analyze Huma Abedin as a "political wife." Abedin is also a veritable Muslim Brotherhood princess. As such, the ideological implications of her actions -- plus her long and privileged access to US policy-making through Hillary Clinton -- must be considered, particularly in the context of national security.
, Huma Abedin's familial and professional connections to the world of jihad are unspeakable .
[snip] Given these alarming professional and family associations, it is hard to imagine how Huma Abedin ever received the security clearance necessary to work closely with the secretary of state. But she did...
-- Huma Abedin "worked for many years at a journal that promotes Islamic supremacist ideology that was founded by a top al-Qaida financier, Abdullah Omar Naseef." That would be for at least seven years (1996-2003), by the way, during which Abedin also worked for Hillary Clinton.
(Excerpt) Read more at jewishworldreview.com ...
Rats and media don’t want any ‘spill over’ on to Hillary and her run in 2016.IMO
I am glad this is finally getting out there..some of us here have reported this for a long time..Now FOX news lets see you report this..We know the Communist media won’t..
Because her husband supports LGBTQ rights and reproductive rights for women and stands up for the poor and blah, blah, blah...
They could both eat babies in their cereal for breakfast and everything would be fine, because nothing matters but the agenda.
I can only imagine what radical islam will do to her husband when he’s outlived his usefulness.
>Why won’t the media cover Huma Abedin’s ties to the global jihad movement?<
Ever thought of the possibility that the MSM is already infiltrated by the jihadis?
Remember, for instance, that Fux News is partly owned by the Saudis.
That’s why the Wiener puts in so much effort in getting the mayoral job. It’s a matter of life and death for him.
Because the media and Huma are on the same side. A better question would be, why was Huma removed from being The muslim brotherhood and Saudis’ spy on Hillary and from being Hillary’s girltoy to being assigned to Weiner, her alleged husband.
Elegant and glamorous are actually code words for ugly as a mud hen and horse faced. Both of which apply. You have to wonder..given her background..whether she has undergone female genital mutilation..is that the source of their sexual problems?
Huma isn't spying in Hitlery. She's still Hitlery's girltoy and the go-between for Hitlery and radical Islam.
Weiner is Huma's beard. He gives Huma legitimacy so that she can claim plausible deniability should anyone say that Huma and Hitlery are lovers.
Michele Bachmann was right again.
Isn't the Abedin-Clinton national security story at least as newsworthy as Weiner's private parts?
The failed main stream "news" media use a simple litmus test to determine whether any given story is so-called "newsworthy:" is it helpful or harmful to the leftist extremist oligarchy that rules in place of our lost constitutional republic and several states?
Back when Michele Bachmann was raising questions about Abedin, my local paper ran an op-ed - written by my brother-in-law - denouncing her as a McCarthyite and asking “Have you no shame?”
I strongly suspect hillary is a muslim convert.
She sure acts like one.
Amen to that. Primary (almost) everyone!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.