This is how Trayvon became more important than Benghazi.
The smartest the republicans could do is link her to Obama's statement about scandals being phony and force the media to ask her some questions:
Hypothetical Statement by Reince Priebus (or anyone in the party):
"I have to say that I absolutely disagree with the position taken by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton that oour ambassador and his security team being murdered in Benghazi is a phony scandal."
As this is published the Hillary media will go into protection mode and allow her an opportunity to make a statement saying the original quote was Obama's, not hers. THEN, the obvious follow up has to be, "do you agree with his statement?"
At that point she has no way out.
(Of course, this is only a fantasy on my part. No one is going to dare put her on the spot for fear of being taken apart by her media.)
And then these reporters get into their Mercedes like Michael Hastings did?
I think we all need to realize what the Breitbart and Hastings deaths were meant to do: scare the chit out of any media people who were considering turning on the Soros coup. They were very, very visible suspicious deaths in LA at critical times when reporters could be doing real investigating and reporting - followed by the media falling mum on those critical investigative stories lurking just below the surface.
Before any of these other scandals will get legs in the media, the grand-daddy scandal has to be dealt with: the coup’s hostage takeover of the media through threats made good.