Skip to comments.Benghazi Leads to Iran, Not Al Qaeda
Posted on 08/03/2013 1:24:47 PM PDT by smoothsailing
click here to read article
Thanks - I was totally confused on this group - you cleared things up... appreciate that...
Which brings us full circle to the big question regarding Hillary:
Criminal, or stupid?
(attribution - Rush Limbaugh)
she was always stupid , her whole life and why she is criminal her whole life too
The reason Obama doesn't want the truth of the Benghazi-to-Syrian Rebels gun-running operation to come out is that all of a sudden the "al Qaeda attacked Benghazi" narrative doesn't make any sense. For, why on earth would al Qaeda attack a gun-running operation to the Syria rebels when the Syria rebels themselves are al Qaeda? Al Qaeda wouldn't be attacking their own al Qaeda weapons pipeline. So, Obama's real fear is not that he ran guns to al Qaeda, but that if this were known, al Qaeda would be removed as the possible suspect in the murder of Ambassador Stevens and three Americans. That is the real problem, because if al Qaeda is removed as a possible suspect because it was benefitting from the gun-running, who's left as a suspect? Who would want an American weapons pipeline to the Syrian rebels shut down? Once al Qaeda is removed from contention, and that question is posed, there is only one answer: the Huzbullah/Iranian axis...
I suspect it’s bigger than the Blind Sheik ... Could it have to do with why dems are passing a bill stopping the death penalty for treason?
>> “What difference does it make?”
Best use of thus far...
bump to the top
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.