Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Japan unveils new carrier-like warship, largest in navy since WWII
FoxNews ^ | 8/6/2013 | AP

Posted on 08/06/2013 9:52:49 PM PDT by Ron C.

Japan on Tuesday unveiled its biggest warship since World War II, a huge flat-top destroyer that has raised eyebrows in China and elsewhere because it bears a strong resemblance to a conventional aircraft carrier.

The ship, which has a flight deck that is nearly 820 feet long, is designed to carry up to 14 helicopters. Japanese officials say it will be used in national defense -- particularly in anti-submarine warfare and border-area surveillance missions -- and to bolster the nation's ability to transport personnel and supplies in response to large-scale natural disasters, like the devastating earthquake and tsunami in 2011.

Though the ship -- dubbed "Izumo" -- has been in the works since 2009, its unveiling comes as Japan and China are locked in a dispute over several small islands located between southern Japan and Taiwan. For months, ships from both countries have been conducting patrols around the isles, called the Senkaku in Japan and the Diaoyutai in China.

The tensions over the islands, along with China's heavy spending on defense and military modernization, have heightened calls in Japan for beefed-up naval and air forces. China recently began operating an aircraft carrier that it refurbished after purchasing from Russia, and is reportedly moving forward with the construction of another that is domestically built.

Japan, China and Taiwan all claim the islands.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: big; carrier; japan; navy; search
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
Something tells me this will become a full-blown aircraft carrier almost overnight... some week close in time.
1 posted on 08/06/2013 9:52:49 PM PDT by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

2 posted on 08/06/2013 9:58:13 PM PDT by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

They can call it whatever they like, but the world knows a carrier when they see one.


3 posted on 08/06/2013 10:05:31 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

The question is no longer how many F-35’s something like that could carry; it’s more like how many Japanese versions of the X47B it could carry.....


4 posted on 08/06/2013 10:08:03 PM PDT by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.
It'll be 12-18 mmonths before it is completely fitted out and sea trialed.

They already have two of the smaller Hyuga Class that look almost exactly the same, just smaller, and there will be a second one of these.


JAPANS NEW IZUMO, DDH-183 AIRCRAFT CARRIER

This is all in response to The Rise of the Chinese Navy.

5 posted on 08/06/2013 10:12:43 PM PDT by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

I noticed that the infrastructure looks very much like the aegis destroyer, so maybe in this sense it is a destroyer mounted on top of an aircraft carrier hull.


6 posted on 08/06/2013 10:26:00 PM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

Maybe it will become a big Giant Robot!

7 posted on 08/06/2013 10:56:44 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
So will its fighters!


8 posted on 08/06/2013 10:58:15 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

Given the extremely low birth rate in Japan who will they get to crew it?

I guess they could sell them to the Philippines


9 posted on 08/06/2013 11:52:25 PM PDT by Fai Mao (Genius at Large)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

HAH! that’s what I was thinking...wait till it transforms ;)
Also, if the Capt. goes by the name of Harlock...well....


10 posted on 08/06/2013 11:53:16 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Fai Mao

The Philippines needs a real military but I doubt they could afford this.

They have a frigate and one about to be commissioned as the stars of their navy fleet. They do not have the support vessels to even dream of a carrier, not even a small one.


11 posted on 08/06/2013 11:55:22 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: varmintman
Zero. No arresting gear. That would be a major modification requiring removal of the aft third of the flight deck, radical changes to the ship infrastructure below deck, a huge weight distribution problem and massive electronics upgrades for the precision landing system.

Nope.

Now, if you want to talk about adding a ski-jump bow... now you have something to go with. notice how nice and flat it is up front? Take off the vertical skin, about 1/8th of the deck plating and I'll bet there's mounting for the jump frame work there.

As to handling a squadron of F-35’s... No problem. It's designed to carry MV-22’s... If they can fit those below deck for maintenance, they can do those as well.

The bigger problem is how to handle mid-air refueling and the functions of an E-2. Now those are problems.

12 posted on 08/07/2013 4:19:31 AM PDT by Freeport (The proper application of high explosives will remove all obstacles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

I’ve been to China—it is not that impressive. A lot of buildings going up, that are of very poor quality. You see new buildings interspersed with slums. Contrary to popular opinion, the Chinese are very disorderly....you see it in their behavior and their traffic.

If it ever came to a real conventional war, I think Japan would kick their a$$. Of course, the Chinese have nukes and the Japanese supposedly don’t. I say supposedly, because it wouldn’t surprise me if they had a few secretly tucked away for emergencies.


13 posted on 08/07/2013 4:22:03 AM PDT by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

That’s one big target.


14 posted on 08/07/2013 4:26:40 AM PDT by gotribe (Vladimir Putin is MY President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

What’s the second “destroyer” called? Akagi?


15 posted on 08/07/2013 4:29:17 AM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Freeport

http://www.examiner.com/article/global-hawk-uav-aerial-refueling-will-accomplish-a-real-milestone

did they ever do the Global Hawk refueling another Global Hawk?

btw- if an a-6 can be a tanker, why can’t an MV-22 refuel other MV-22’s or even F-35’s in a pinch?


16 posted on 08/07/2013 4:48:00 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

ruh-roh...


17 posted on 08/07/2013 4:48:44 AM PDT by OldNewYork (Biden '13. Impeach now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Hyuga

launched in 2007

Ise

Launched in 2009

18 posted on 08/07/2013 4:53:05 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
“I noticed that the infrastructure looks very much like the aegis destroyer,”........

The Japs have been the greatest “copiers” the world has ever known. Why reinvent the wheel?

19 posted on 08/07/2013 5:04:35 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Good morning. I hope you are doing well.

That's easily converted into a carrier with VSTOL aircraft. The Japanese should have named the ship "Agaki." That would have pissed off a lot of people.

5.56mm

20 posted on 08/07/2013 5:19:02 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson