Skip to comments.
Replacing Lindsey Graham: Exclusive Interview with Richard Cash
The Greenville (SC) Post ^
| Thursday, August 08, 2013
| Joshua Cook
Posted on 08/08/2013 4:27:36 AM PDT by Resettozero
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: kitkat
Not talking about Joshua Cook. Talkng about Lee Bright.
21
posted on
08/08/2013 6:00:39 AM PDT
by
C. Edmund Wright
(Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
To: Resettozero
22
posted on
08/08/2013 6:01:45 AM PDT
by
C. Edmund Wright
(Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
To: Theodore R.
Agreed. But, reality trumps the way things should be. This race is far too important to send Lindsey back. Lindsey is a Fritz Hollings style senator who votes against the wishes of those he represents.
23
posted on
08/08/2013 6:21:13 AM PDT
by
The_Media_never_lie
(Actually, they lie when it suits them! The crooked MS media must be defeated any way it can be done!)
To: upchuck
Better hope there is a primary on the rat side, or they will vote en-masse for Limp Lindsey...
24
posted on
08/08/2013 6:21:50 AM PDT
by
BrewingFrog
(I brew, therefore I am!)
To: BrewingFrog
Better hope there is a primary on the rat side, or they will vote en-masse for Limp Lindsey...
Haven't heard either Mace, Bright, or Cash say that Graham's defeat is a certitude. Every S.C. conservative hopefully understands that it's an uphill campaign to the end.
To: Resettozero
Nice interview with Richard Cash.
The good thing about this thread is that I haven’t seen a single negative comment directed toward any of Lindsey Graham’s challengers. Let’s hope that continues and that conservatives hold their fire to direct it solely in Little Lindsey’s direction and not at any of his challengers.
To: penelopesire
I guess the next question would be if there are any democrat challengers? Sounds like there needs to be in order to keep the dems from voting in republican primary and re electing Graham.
That's precisely what happened in 2008 and the rules have not changed significantly. It's a problem indeed. Graham's defeat will not be easy at all.
To: Resettozero
So there was no democrat primary for the seat in 2008?
28
posted on
08/08/2013 7:55:28 AM PDT
by
penelopesire
(TIME FOR OBAMA TO ANSWER FOR BENGHAZI UNDER OATH!!)
To: BrewingFrog
Bingo! Sounds like the TP should find a couple of blue dogs to run on dem ticket to me, but I am no strategist. I am tired of these rinos rigging elections and districts for permanent power. Same problem with getting rid of Boehner.
29
posted on
08/08/2013 8:04:38 AM PDT
by
penelopesire
(TIME FOR OBAMA TO ANSWER FOR BENGHAZI UNDER OATH!!)
To: Theodore R.
Name ID is the back-up of the uninformed.The uninformed do the choosing.
30
posted on
08/08/2013 8:07:26 AM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
To: BrewingFrog
Yes, popular Democrats (the kind Jack French Kemp kept calling “our Democratic friends”) do sometimes pack the little Republican primaries in SC. It’s allowed. And it keeps Lindsey smiling.
31
posted on
08/08/2013 9:34:02 AM PDT
by
Theodore R.
(The grand pooh-bahs have spoken: "It's Jebbie's turn!")
To: Joe Boucher
Yes, Strom voted for DC statehood in 1978, along with Howard Baker, and started edging leftward thereafter. I don’t recall if he voted for King Day, but he may well have.
32
posted on
08/08/2013 9:35:27 AM PDT
by
Theodore R.
(The grand pooh-bahs have spoken: "It's Jebbie's turn!")
To: Resettozero
he is not even a pimple on the deviant lifestle elite media.
the effete elite will not even mention him unless he comes out as a homosexual/proabortion/proguncontrol/protaxes/prozombie RINO worse than graham.
33
posted on
08/08/2013 9:42:56 AM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: longtermmemmory
To: BrewingFrog
I haven’t heard a thing about any RATS in the race. SC is overwhelmingly Republican. Any attempt by the RATS probably won’t go far.
35
posted on
08/08/2013 10:19:24 AM PDT
by
upchuck
(To the faceless, jack-booted government bureaucrat who just scanned this post: SCREW YOU!)
To: Theodore R.
Indeed. Therefore, if there is a rat running, he (or she) needs an opponent to keep the rat crossovers out of our primary.
We can play this game smart...
36
posted on
08/08/2013 11:03:17 AM PDT
by
BrewingFrog
(I brew, therefore I am!)
To: upchuck
And thank you for the pings.
I just saw online Lou Dobbs mangled interview with Nancy Mace on camera. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vwJuBrpPto&feature=youtu.be&a
It is mystifying to me that none of the three guys who I have seen interview her so far (Cavuto, Beck, Dodd) seemingly can remember how to conduct a decent, informative interview.
Dodd botched his part and stumbled much; Mace did as good as anyone could in countering Dodd’s unveiled attempts at GOTCHA! What’s up with these attacks on Mace from the very outset of her campaign?
To: Resettozero
Whats up with these attacks on Mace from the very outset of her campaign?Consider that maybe they are afraid of her. Reminiscent of Plain?
38
posted on
08/08/2013 1:59:19 PM PDT
by
upchuck
(To the faceless, jack-booted government bureaucrat who just scanned this post: SCREW YOU!)
To: upchuck
Consider that maybe they are afraid of her. Reminiscent of Palin?
Watching Dobbs go after her, and remembering the previous interviews she's had this week, I had the same thought. Beck and Dobbs both showed the leading edges of contempt for her. Just wondering about these things.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson