Posted on 08/13/2013 4:10:12 PM PDT by dontreadthis
Being a melanin enriched conservative myself, I just might. They're doing the job the congressional Republicans ought to be doing.
This is going to be thrown out....as it omits Jamie Zapata.
On Thursday July 11, 2013, Congress is beginning impeachment proceedings against Barack Obama....
Members of Congress are reportedly beginning impeachment against Barack Obama based on the grounds of lying about Benghazi,.... the IRS scandal ....and attacking the press..... unauthorized use of the military in Libya and Syria. ..... Congress is also looking into his involvement the unauthorized use of the military in Libya and Syria.... and the Fast and Furious scandal.
http://weeklyworldnews.com/politics/45122/obama-impeachment-hearings-begin/
see -post 37 Congress supposedly already began Impeachment proceedings....
Timeline to Veterans For Peaces Vote to Impeach Obama
by CentralFloridaVFP
7/22/2013:
VFP charman, Phil Restino was the guest on KTOO public access radio program Peace Talk in Juno Alaska . The show is hosted by Phil Smith of the Southeast Alaska Veterans For Peace Chapter 100.
Phil Restino is charman of the Central Florida chapter of Veterans For Peace (136) to tell the history behind VFP Resolution 2011-7 calling on the U.S. Congress to immediately begin impeachment proceedings against the Democrat President Barack Obama for war crimes the same war crimes cited for the VFP resolution to Impeach GW Bush.
Restino also discussed the current VFP Resolution 2013-10 to be voted on Saturday August 10th at the Veterans For Peace National Convention in Madison, WI.
On Monday March 11, 2013, Congress is reportedly beginning impeachment proceedings against Barack Obama.
Members of Congress are reportedly beginning impeachment against Barack Obama based on the grounds of unauthorized military use in Libya and Syria. Congress is also looking at his involvement in Fast and Furious.
According to Congressional representatives Barack Obama has violated the rules set that clearly state that the President must seek Congressional approval before using military force. Now he says it was OK because he had international support. But how does that make it okay? They arent our Congress. They dont determine what is right or wrong for us.
...
Sources close to aides in Congress say the law clearly states any use of military force by Obama without explicit consent and authorization of Congress constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, Section 4 of the Constitution.
H.CON.RES.107 —
Expressing the sense of Congress that the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress constitutes an impeachable high... (Introduced in House - IH)
HCON 107 IH
112th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. CON. RES. 107
Expressing the sense of Congress that the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
March 7, 2012
Mr. JONES submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of Congress that the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution.
Whereas the cornerstone of the Republic is honoring Congress’s exclusive power to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that, except in response to an actual or imminent attack against the territory of the United States, the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress violates Congress’s exclusive power to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution and therefore constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.CON.RES.107:
Listed below are the One Hundred and Sixty Six Articles of Impeachment against Obama:
http://conservativepapers.com/news/2012/04/04/a-case-for-impeaching-obama/
One Hundred and Sixty Six Articles of Impeachment against Obama:
*************
add one more
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3054276/posts?page=26#26
Obama revealed a sealed indictment - violation of court order - impeachable according to Joe DiGenova
Joe DiGenova on WMAL 8-12-13
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=qtmeo07cXGQ
Thanks for the ping! Even if nothing comes of this, I hope we hear more from this lady. You’re right, her curriculum vitae is a knockout!
Thanks Whenifhow.
And it isn’t if Obama has improved and can improve the lives of blacks. Just ask Calypso Louie.
Bump back up to the top!
NAACP will scream that NBRA is racist against the ‘whacko’ Imposter-in-cheap. (white mixed black=whack+ovomit=whacko), LOL. Look like NAACP’s race card is over limit now.
We’re going to be all right and our country is going to be great again. As Samuel Adam once said: If ever a time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin.
Here we go! Citizens impeachment. We can all do this. Tea Party, DAR, NRA, garden club...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.