1 posted on
08/20/2013 5:51:05 PM PDT by
John W
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: John W
2 posted on
08/20/2013 5:55:49 PM PDT by
John W
(Viva Cristo Rey!)
To: John W
Hey NSA - You are my enemy. Which one of us is the traitor?
3 posted on
08/20/2013 5:56:43 PM PDT by
DManA
To: John W
Funny. I don’t feel secure.
4 posted on
08/20/2013 5:57:14 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: John W
The stories I could tell but, WTF ever.
5 posted on
08/20/2013 5:58:24 PM PDT by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
To: John W; COUNTrecount; Nowhere Man; FightThePower!; C. Edmund Wright; jacob allen; Travis McGee; ...
Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping!
To get onto The Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping List you must threaten to report me to the Mods if I dont add you to the list...
6 posted on
08/20/2013 5:59:38 PM PDT by
null and void
(Frequent terrorist attacks OR endless government snooping and oppression? We can have both!)
To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...
7 posted on
08/20/2013 6:03:03 PM PDT by
Nachum
(I am Breitbartacus!)
To: John W
This is the most corrupt and lawless Admin in the history of our once great country. And NO ONE will do anything about it!
10 posted on
08/20/2013 6:23:30 PM PDT by
originalbuckeye
(Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy)
To: John W
11 posted on
08/20/2013 6:25:37 PM PDT by
Chode
(Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: John W
The term “data collection” at the NSA is used only when...
1. The data undergoes analysis
AND ALSO
2. The data is **NOT** stored
Think that over —how often is data deemed important enough to merit analysis but NOT storage? I’d say damned near NEVER.
So be that definition they can TRUTHFULLY state they are COLLECTING very little data from Americans (while scooping up everything).
**UNDERSTAND THE ENEMY’S LINGO***
12 posted on
08/20/2013 6:35:46 PM PDT by
gaijin
To: John W
This is just current reach. They have capacity right now for 100 years at the current levels of data worldwide.
13 posted on
08/20/2013 6:44:14 PM PDT by
eyedigress
((zOld storm chaser from the west)/ ?s)
To: John W
Cut the 15 intermediate leaks and let it be known that the NSA is taping all communications and capturing all the content in addition to metadata. When they get caught in this lie they will say that they captured and stored it but didn’t look at it unless authorized. This is from the incompetents that allowed a low level employee to walk out the door with everything. Now consider, David Axexrod, Valerie Jarrett, or any of the other Progressive political pond scum having access to any of this information .... why, you could probably turn John Roberts, Dufus McCain or Nancy Graham.
18 posted on
08/20/2013 7:03:13 PM PDT by
RetiredTexasVet
(The only growth industries left under Progressives are government and poverty.)
To: John W
America is now under a dictator King Obama. And we have nothing to stop this destruct of America. Even the Republicans are totally ineffective and worthless.
To: John W
We know that the enemy has worked hard not to use electronic communications, relying instead on mules to carry information.
Now that this is public, why collect data that isn’t related to terrorism since the terrorists are not using electronic communications?
Furthermore, IIRC they only need 4 metadata points (or is it 5) to identify you specifically and individually. Could this information be abused? Take a look at history, recent history specifically and see that government lies, obfuscates and is by its very nature political.
25 posted on
08/20/2013 7:37:59 PM PDT by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
To: John W
26 posted on
08/20/2013 7:38:00 PM PDT by
Timber Rattler
(Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
To: John W
The NSA “scandals” are a distraction. NSA had authorization to do many of the things we are upset about.
The bigger more important issues are the fact that US government agencies were used to influence the outcome of elections. Presidential elections.
And where did the data in Obama’s Civitas database come from? IRS, Census, HHS, Homeland Security, NSA?
32 posted on
08/20/2013 8:09:35 PM PDT by
DBrow
To: John W; All
Was then Secretary of the Treasury Timmy Geithner the original author of the IRS harassment policy towards the TEA Party?
33 posted on
08/20/2013 8:33:14 PM PDT by
Graewoulf
(Traitor John Roberts' Commune-Style Obama'care' violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
To: John W
what did Bronco Bama know and when did he know he knew it?
This Message Not Approved by the NSA
36 posted on
08/20/2013 8:46:01 PM PDT by
MeshugeMikey
(Block Captain..Tyranny Response Team)
To: John W
The National Security Agencywhich possesses only limited legal authority to spy on U.S. citizenshas built a surveillance network that covers more Americans' Internet communications than officials have publicly disclosed The government lied to us? I am shcoked, shocked!
43 posted on
08/21/2013 4:38:47 AM PDT by
shego
To: John W
"retains the written content of emails sent between citizens within the U.S." The government is reading your mail.
If your email was a stamped mailed letter, the NSA would be in prison.
The NSA is only a scintilla of a technicality away from being felonious.
45 posted on
08/21/2013 6:23:06 AM PDT by
Uncle Miltie
(Where's my pressure cooker backpack wmd ricin laced al qaeda terrorist BASSELOPE?)
To: John W
"The system has the capacity to reach roughly 75% of all U.S. Internet traffic in the hunt for foreign intelligence," How come I don't beleive that bolded section?
49 posted on
08/21/2013 7:12:27 AM PDT by
Darksheare
(Try my coffee, first one's free.....)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson