Skip to comments.
New Mexico photographer loses gay marriage case
AP/Deseret News ^
| 8/23/2013
Posted on 08/23/2013 6:48:09 AM PDT by markomalley
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-119 next last
To: onedoug
That is where the deck is stacked. What private citizen has the resources for such a fight? The queers have deep pockets from the likes of Soros, Hollywood, and other queer lovers.
To: OneWingedShark
I think we all need a copy of the New Mexico Human Rights Act. And then we need to hang it on every school wall across the nation for all our youth to see.
Apparently, it is now the supreme law of the land. Our federal and state constitutions were so old-school anyway...
42
posted on
08/23/2013 7:05:59 AM PDT
by
Flycatcher
(God speaks to us, through the supernal lightness of birds, in a special type of poetry.)
To: svcw
If two men holding hands ask you to take a picture of their nuptials you know.
43
posted on
08/23/2013 7:06:11 AM PDT
by
DManA
To: markomalley
Track and photograph
Justice Richard Bosson's every move.
Give him ZERO privacy.
Expose his dirty laundry, research all his personal records, and make them public.
Never let him have a free moment.
44
posted on
08/23/2013 7:07:05 AM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: markomalley
The court held that "a commercial photography business that offers its services to the public, thereby increasing its visibility to potential clients" is bound by the New Mexico Human Rights Act "and must serve same-sex couples on the same basis that it serves opposite-sex couples."
I thought involuntary servitude is not allowed in the US.
To: markomalley
This will wind up in federal court where it will most likely be overturned...U.S. constitution precedes any state court. People of New Mexico need to realize what electing democrats really entails!!!
46
posted on
08/23/2013 7:07:09 AM PDT
by
ontap
(***)
To: SkyDancer
But if it was a muslim photographer hired to photograph a pork BBQ party ......To heck with that. Find a muslime caterer and ask them to make BBQ pork ribs and pork sausage. Bet the court won't touch that issue.
47
posted on
08/23/2013 7:07:27 AM PDT
by
Arrowhead1952
(The Second Amendment is NOT about the right to hunt. It IS a right to shoot tyrants.)
To: massgopguy
I hope they appeal but it’s an expensive process and there are not enough constitutional lawyers able to take.
48
posted on
08/23/2013 7:07:43 AM PDT
by
Hostage
(Be Breitbart!)
To: John S Mosby
Yes, the judiciary is now the super legislature. The upper, upper house.
49
posted on
08/23/2013 7:09:32 AM PDT
by
DManA
To: HereInTheHeartland
Most assuredly is.... if the state can tell you who you must serve or if people can smoke in your establishment it can find a way to tell you anything it pleases....and it will!!!!
50
posted on
08/23/2013 7:10:21 AM PDT
by
ontap
(***)
To: Cheerio
Life on earth is the only heaven these arrogant perv’s will ever experience. Enjoy it while it lasts because the kingdom of heaven will refuse them entry and no leftist hack judge can overrule it either.
51
posted on
08/23/2013 7:11:18 AM PDT
by
tflabo
(Truth or Tyranny)
To: Cheerio
Life on earth is the only heaven these arrogant perv’s will ever experience. Enjoy it while it lasts because the kingdom of heaven will refuse them entry and no leftist hack judge can overrule it either.
52
posted on
08/23/2013 7:11:20 AM PDT
by
tflabo
(Truth or Tyranny)
To: DManA
For those of you from Rio Linda, nuptials is not a naughty body part.
53
posted on
08/23/2013 7:11:37 AM PDT
by
DManA
To: DManA
Because that is what they are telling me, if two men walked into my store not holding hands I would not know.
54
posted on
08/23/2013 7:12:16 AM PDT
by
svcw
(Stand or die)
To: needmorePaine
Solution: “Yes, this photography studio would be happy to serve you... er, unfortunately, none of the photographers we have on staff want to work for you, and there’s a law in this state that says we are not permitted to compel them to do so.”
55
posted on
08/23/2013 7:14:49 AM PDT
by
alancarp
(Obama will grab your guns and ship them to Mexican drug mobs.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Easy solution, take really crappy pictures and then sue when they refuse to pay. That's what I was thinking. Then, when the word gets out to the Rainbow crowd about the lousy photos and service, the photographer won't be bothered by that crowd anymore.
56
posted on
08/23/2013 7:16:55 AM PDT
by
bkopto
(Obama and Biden are merely symptoms of a more profound, systemic disease in American body politic.)
To: DManA
Yep, we’ve not had the right to freedom of association for over a half century.
57
posted on
08/23/2013 7:19:35 AM PDT
by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
To: Flycatcher
No, homosexuality trumps everything.
58
posted on
08/23/2013 7:20:16 AM PDT
by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
To: IYAS9YAS
same to the state
anyone that thinks they can force me to perform work is highly delusional
59
posted on
08/23/2013 7:21:00 AM PDT
by
sten
(fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
To: bkopto
That's what I was thinking. Then, when the word gets out to the Rainbow crowd about the lousy photos and service, the photographer won't be bothered by that crowd anymore.
Yes, but word might get out to the general public that the photographer stinks at taking pictures, and the business could end up going under completely.
Almost as if it is by design...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-119 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson