Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Inhofe: ‘Military Has No Money Left’ for Syria
Roll Call ^ | 28 Aug 13 | Niels Lesniewski

Posted on 08/30/2013 7:24:34 AM PDT by SkyPilot

The top Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee announced Wednesday he opposed military intervention in Syria unless he finds more money for the Defense budget and details a broader strategy.

“Today I told the Administration that I cannot support military action in Syria unless the President presents to Congress his broader strategy in the region that addresses our national security interests and the budget to support it. President Obama has decimated our military beginning with his first budget four and a half years ago. He has underfunded overseas contingency operations (OCO) fund, reduced base defense budget, and put into motion sequestration. Our military has no money left,” Sen. James M. Inhofe, R-Okla., said in a statement.

“Will the President pay for this operation with more furloughs and by grounding squadrons again? By continuing to raid the already underfunded base defense budget, Administration Obama further undermines future military readiness and capabilities,” Inhofe said. Of course, the sequester Defense cuts were passed by Congress as part of the 2011 budget law that was enacted on a bipartisan basis.

Finding more money for defense to pay for Syria would be complicated by the fact that Congress will be grappling with the ongoing fight over the sequester and a stalemate on next year’s budget when it returns from the August break. Inhofe has other concerns as well. “The United States should also not consider a strategy without thoroughly consulting and heeding the advice of our partners in the region, which include Israel, Jordan and Turkey,” Inhofe said. “It is vital we avoid shortsighted military action that would have little impact on the long-term trajectory of the conflict. We can’t simply launch a few missiles and hope for the best.”

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.rollcall.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: furloughs; military; sequestration; syria
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last


Every American that voted for this should be ashamed of themselves.

If we go to war, there will be aircrews lost, and military lives lost. The Pentagon cannot even make payroll for it's doctors and nurses.

Thousands of Civilian Medical Staffers Leave Defense Amid Furloughs


1 posted on 08/30/2013 7:24:34 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

That’s okay, Obama has no plans to replace the 200 $1 million cruise missiles he plans to lob at Syria.


2 posted on 08/30/2013 7:26:00 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the people. T Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

The military is not BO’s mercenaries. So, no, there’s no money for Syria in the Pentagon.


3 posted on 08/30/2013 7:26:56 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants; SkyPilot

bh0 continues on his mission of destroying the US military as a viable force to defend this nation.


4 posted on 08/30/2013 7:27:49 AM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

While hundreds of thousands of veterans wait for their justly deserved benefits to be processed by the feckless Dept. of Veterans Affairs. This is a disgrace to the nation and a gross dereliction of duty.


5 posted on 08/30/2013 7:28:36 AM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
It wouldn't surprise me at all if that Obama's whole point - to use a "humanitarian" action to bury the US military.

Its obvious to me at least that he'd rather have a strong domestic army than an internationally focused one.

6 posted on 08/30/2013 7:29:56 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

With no thanks to GWB of course.


7 posted on 08/30/2013 7:30:21 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
SS and Medicare are on automatic pilot. Obama has no control over the spending. With 10,000 people retiring every day and will continue to do so for the next 20 years, entitlement spending will continue to increase.

The slight dip in Medicare spending is due to Obamacare and the eventual elimination of the Medicare advantage program.

8 posted on 08/30/2013 7:32:38 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

No money.
No budget.
No accountability.
No integrity.
No transparency.
No protection of the Homeland.
No equality of Law.
Heck, no more law at all.

Treason, whoring, drunkeness,
violations of their Oaths,
abuse of power and law are THE trademarks
of this US Congress.


9 posted on 08/30/2013 7:36:24 AM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

I love Heritage, but why is the graph titled ‘Obama BUDGET...’. The way I understand it (and I could certainly be wrong), but congress has not adopted any of his budgets.


10 posted on 08/30/2013 7:39:58 AM PDT by Vanbasten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
It's called "Collapsing the System" and it is from the Cloward–Piven strategy.




The Muslims are guilty of the chemical attack, not the Christians, and the ILLEGAL ALIEN IN CHIEF knows it.
But the ARAB-KENYANand MUSLIM defiling the Oval Office doesn't care.
Barack Hussein Obama II, (a.k.a. Barry Soetoro) just want to turn Syria into another Muslim Brotherhood run country, and kill Christians.
It's just that simple!

Read Obama Gets His War On by Daniel Greenfield.
Here's what I got out of it.


11 posted on 08/30/2013 7:41:47 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

No money for flyovers at NASCAR races. No money for White House tours and he wants to attack Syria?


12 posted on 08/30/2013 7:43:39 AM PDT by Captain7seas (Fire Jane Lubchenco and John Pistole.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar
With 10,000 people retiring every day and will continue to do so for the next 20 years, entitlement spending will continue to increase.

So something I paid for since I was 16 years old (maybe excluding my 3 years in the military)is an entitlement? Well FU and the horse you rode in on!

13 posted on 08/30/2013 7:49:01 AM PDT by Starstruck (If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarcasm or criticism...or do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Starstruck
So something I paid for since I was 16 years old (maybe excluding my 3 years in the military)is an entitlement? Well FU and the horse you rode in on!

The money you paid into the system does not cover the benefits you receive. And the money you contributed went towards the benefits of the retirees. Today's workers pay for today's retirees. Medicare and SS are pay as you go systems.

This graph shows that the average man and woman (average defined in the study as average income over their working lives and living to the average life expectancy) who start receiving benefits in 2010 get over 3 times more in benefits than they pay in to the system! Of importance, the study accounts for inflation by calculating all past taxes and future payments in 2010 dollars to provide an accurate comparison.

If the notion that Medicare recipients are simply "getting back what they paid in" is false then where is the money coming from? Simply, the excess received is being borrowed from younger generations and the cost is more than we can bear.

You can rationalize all you want about your contributions to the system, but the fact is that you (and I) are being subsidized by borrowed money from our children and grandchildren. Ponzi schemes are great if you are at the top of the pyramid.

14 posted on 08/30/2013 8:08:59 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Now we know the strategy he is using - start a war and then push for more continuing resolutions with Zero-Care and other welfare projects attached. It will be “for our brave warriors” dontyaknow...


15 posted on 08/30/2013 8:17:29 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Money Inhofe? We don’t have enough lives either. Let’s be neural in arab wars, saves money and lives.


16 posted on 08/30/2013 8:33:54 AM PDT by ex-snook (God is Love)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Hundreds of reason to stay out of this mess... almost no reasons to go in...


17 posted on 08/30/2013 8:47:52 AM PDT by GOPJ (Chicago's 10 year murder toll exceeds that of all US soldiers killed in Afghanistan..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

You have no idea how much I have paid in and the amount of benefits I have received. I could die tomorrow and not even claim what I paid last year. The cost you bear are no more than the cost I bore. Are you paying more than I paid for the last 10 years?


18 posted on 08/30/2013 8:58:09 AM PDT by Starstruck (If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarcasm or criticism...or do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Starstruck
I don't care how much you paid in benefits. This isn't about you, it is about the entire entitlement system. They are Ponzi schemes that represent over $70 trillion in unfunded liabilities. They are unsustainable.

I could die tomorrow and not even claim what I paid last year.

Or you could live to 110 and get twenty times whatever you contributed to the system.

The cost you bear are no more than the cost I bore. Are you paying more than I paid for the last 10 years?

I am 70 years old. I am a taker not a giver. The difference between you and me is that I recognize that SS and Medicare are entitlement programs that will on average, pay out far more in benefits than an individual contributes to the system. This is particularly true for those retired now and the coming baby boomer cohort.

Medicare has been running in the red since 2008 and SS since 2010. They will continue to do so unless they are reformed. I get a kick out of the FINOs (FReepers in Name Only) who rail about welfare and government deficits but staunchly defend the entitlement programs, which they don't want cut based on the specious rationale that they paid for them. The reality is quite different.

19 posted on 08/30/2013 9:55:31 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

No money? Try no weapons. No f22s nothing. He wants us to lose a war, just like LBJS, to prop his false peace surrender wagon poverty for the gays.


20 posted on 08/30/2013 10:03:20 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson