Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Impy

“Wild In The Streets” should be required viewing (demonstrating why the 18-under 21 set should never have been enfranchised, save military members). It’s like the “Idiocracy” of its era.


70 posted on 09/01/2013 4:29:29 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; BillyBoy

Well I’m definitely not in favor of granting special civil rights based on military service, I doubt that would be constitutional anyway (equal protection), the age should be the same for all. I would have hated missing 2002, I missed 2000 by 1 year. It would be nice to be free of the drooling 18-21 set though.

I don’t much agree with the drinking age being 21 either, either you are a legal adult or not. They all drink anyway.

This begs the question do we really want to go back to considering 18, 19 and 20 year olds to be minors? If not then they should have all the rights of adulthood. If so then under 21’s shouldn’t be able to marry or join the military either.


71 posted on 09/01/2013 4:51:23 PM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson