Skip to comments.
Dangerous Times: Are Obama's Syrian Stumbles Good for America?
AmericanThinker.com ^
| 9/7/2013
| James Lewis
Posted on 09/07/2013 8:28:13 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
To: RoosterRedux
As long as Obama keeps his minions fed, they won’t abandon him - no matter what he does. The moment the federal gravy train runs dry, “Holder’s people” will go Ceausecu on him.
2
posted on
09/07/2013 8:44:26 AM PDT
by
Cowboy Bob
(Democrats: Robbing Peter to buy Paul's vote.)
To: RoosterRedux
I had to read into the article to find out which Democratic President was considered the first anti-American President.
The author says the 1953 coup in Iran happened in Stalin's lifetime--actually it happened in August, a few months after Stalin's death.
To: Cowboy Bob
When the gravy train ends, Obama will blame it on someone else and his tribe will believe him 100%.
To: RoosterRedux
Outstanding article, thanks for posting.
5
posted on
09/07/2013 8:50:20 AM PDT
by
The_Media_never_lie
(Actually, they lie when it suits them! The crooked MS media must be defeated any way it can be done!)
To: RoosterRedux
Impeach the wannabe dictator!!
6
posted on
09/07/2013 8:51:51 AM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
To: RoosterRedux
“Without the Taliban, the Twin Towers would still be standing in Manhattan. Today Obama is trying to make friends with them.”
eh?
7
posted on
09/07/2013 8:54:50 AM PDT
by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: RoosterRedux
Who would have ever thought that we'd elect an anti-American for _Resident ??
Why he'd have to keep his thoughts to himself , read only from telepromters, vote "Present" during significant legislation ,
and isolate himself from public opinion, and establish a propaganda machine in the media
and in a complicit press to cover up his failures.
That some legislator would call him a liar, even as that official lied to a mass of legislators and the American people on TV ?
Why would we ever elect such a politician ?
We would never do that , would we as a nation ...?
8
posted on
09/07/2013 8:55:00 AM PDT
by
Tilted Irish Kilt
(Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
To: RoosterRedux
It’s good if the stupid masses finally wake up and realize that elections have consequences.
9
posted on
09/07/2013 8:55:38 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: RoosterRedux
Maybe these aren't stumbles but part of a master plan.
10
posted on
09/07/2013 8:55:49 AM PDT
by
McGruff
(Strange times are these in which we live..)
To: RoosterRedux
By now it's impossible to avoid the conclusion that Obama is fervently anti-American. Which is what you might learn from his personal history, all the way from Mom the Stalinist, to his "mentor" Frank Davis the child pornographer, all the way to the "Reverend" Jerry Wright and the Alinsky Machine in Chicago The only incongruity in the quoted portion above is the qualification "by now." There were many of us who posted countless times before Obama was sworn in that his biography, his autobiography, his associations, and his writings as well is his public statements all compel the conclusion that he was a radical leftist, perhaps a Manchurian Muslim, and no friend of the United States of America.
One might take issue with the author's assessment that Obama is a bumbler, it might be rather that he has a very difficult needle to thread which is to consistently aid the enemies of America, for example, as the author points out, the Muslim brotherhood, while not appearing blatant about it. It is difficult to know exactly what Obama's hidden agenda is but he cannot act entirely as a free agent even among his most trusted White House intimates and certainly not with such public figures as John Kerry or Chuck Hagel. That is not to say that these men share our agenda but it is to say that they would certainly react to any overt act of treason they observed in Obama. At least Obama cannot be certain that they would fail to react.
Finally, it is well to remember that Obama is a radical leftist and that is an animal very different from a leftist like Jimmy Carter. Obama is not Jimmy Carter on steroids. Obama is an entirely different kind of leftist, one who aggressively seeks to diminish America and remove it as the principal obstacle to one world socialism (or a worldwide caliphate if you are in that camp). These aggressive leftists, think Trotsky, chairman Mao, Pol Pot, Stalin are to a man indifferent to human suffering and quite willing to order an effusion of blood to advance their own power. I do not believe for a minute that Obama will shrink from waging war to advance his agenda. I think his problem is to find an inflection point which the public will accept and which advances a cause which the public, if aware of its real purpose, would oppose bitterly.
11
posted on
09/07/2013 8:58:36 AM PDT
by
nathanbedford
("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
To: RoosterRedux
...was Clinton’s missed opportunities to get UBL good for the US?
... was Carter’s diplomacy good for the hostages held for 444 days?
... was Johnson’s micro-managing the Viet Nam War from the WH good for the military?
... was Hillary’s denial of more security good for the Benghazi embassy?
...was Odungo’s Dereliction of Duty good for the people who died on September 11th 2012
..it’s best if the little muslim boy king plays golf for the next three years, preferably overseas with minimum security.
12
posted on
09/07/2013 8:59:47 AM PDT
by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: RoosterRedux
13
posted on
09/07/2013 9:11:56 AM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: RoosterRedux
To: nathanbedford
Three brilliant paragraphs; they should be a column somewhere.
15
posted on
09/07/2013 9:12:54 AM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: RoosterRedux
16
posted on
09/07/2013 9:14:51 AM PDT
by
353FMG
( I do not say whether I am serious or sarcastic -- I respect FReepers too much.)
To: Travis McGee
You think members of Congress and the MSM will notice?
And if they did, do you think they’ll care?
17
posted on
09/07/2013 9:20:16 AM PDT
by
353FMG
( I do not say whether I am serious or sarcastic -- I respect FReepers too much.)
To: 353FMG
18
posted on
09/07/2013 9:29:40 AM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: RoosterRedux
Nothing good will come from this. Either he backs down from his red line, and looks like an even bigger cream puff to our enemies, who are then encouraged to make even bolder moves against us. Or he attacks, risking the lives of American troops, risking an full-blown shooting match with the Russkies, and possibly activating sleeper cells who are already in the USA (thanks to permissive immigration and wide-open borders), and we wind up with Boston and 9-11 x 100...or more.
Also, while our attention is diverted, the deadline to defund Obamacare will quietly pass, and we will find ourselves irreversibly slipping downhill toward full-on Socialized medicine. Maybe so-called "comprehensive immigration reform" will also pass, along with punitive tax increases on firearms and ammo. Who knows what will happen with the Obammunist's latest distraction?
Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!
19
posted on
09/07/2013 10:07:56 AM PDT
by
wku man
(It's almost deer season, got your DEERGOGGLES on yet? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jexrnFq2fXY)
To: RoosterRedux
Nothing that this dictator does is good for America. And I don’t think he gives a damn about the fates of his so-called wife and kids either. Thus is he truly dangerous.
20
posted on
09/07/2013 10:18:05 AM PDT
by
onedoug
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson