the rest of the title is: but only if You Can Stop Future Politicians from Confiscating the Accumulated Wealth
1 posted on
09/09/2013 7:46:21 AM PDT by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
They are coming for the pensions.
2 posted on
09/09/2013 7:48:25 AM PDT by
VRW Conspirator
(Producing Talk Show Prep since 1998.)
To: Kaslin
Bring back American manufacturing.
From overseas.
Chinese factories, only benefit Chinese workers.
Bring foreign manufacturing jobs back to America.
Now.
To: Kaslin
They have been talking about going after the 401K’s for years...
Anyone think they wont?
7 posted on
09/09/2013 7:57:34 AM PDT by
Mr. K
(Lies, Damned Lies, Statistics, and then Democrat Talking Points.)
To: Kaslin
This is on Obama’s agenda—including the contents of your safety deposit box.
The only secure savings are gold and silver coins for which you paid cash so there is no paper trail.
8 posted on
09/09/2013 8:01:15 AM PDT by
Arthur McGowan
(If you're FOR sticking scissors in a female's neck and sucking out her brains, you are PRO-WOMAN!)
To: stephenjohnbanker; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; Gilbo_3; Impy; NFHale; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; ...
RE :”
Heres a video that explains why a privatized or personalized Social Security system is the only way of dealing with the current systems bankruptcy without screwing younger workers.” Younger workers must get screwed anyway because retirees demand their checks and both party pols will make sure they get thembeing terrified of their votes. That is why they make believe there is a real trust fund when its just funded by national borrowing, still screwing them.
So the younger workers will either pay it with payroll taxes or addition to national debt, which was Bush proposal. They do both now.
Alternatively Ryan's Medicare brainstorm proposed passing cuts that wouldnt (any of them) go into effect for 10 years, which still screws them. They pay the bills for 10 years, the remainder from borrowing, then when they retire they are told 'out of luck sorry' . Still a scam that tries to protect those who pass it (except it was too obvious.)
9 posted on
09/09/2013 8:02:11 AM PDT by
sickoflibs
(To GOP : Any path to US Citizenship IS putting them ahead in line. Stop lying about your position.)
To: Kaslin
I've read articles like this one about Poland's move, and I'm still confused.
Is this a outright seizure or not? Did the government simply take the bonds and offer nothing at all in return?
Or did the government take the bonds, but the original owners will still be paid the interest on the bonds?
12 posted on
09/09/2013 8:04:26 AM PDT by
Leaning Right
(Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
To: Kaslin
If politicians steal your money, shoot the politicians.
17 posted on
09/09/2013 8:13:58 AM PDT by
Uncle Miltie
(Are Marines required to salute Al Qaeda yet?)
To: Kaslin
This is another “I’m done f*cking around” line.
Cross it, and I’ll start making people bleed for it.
Enough is enough is enough is enough...
27 posted on
09/09/2013 10:18:05 AM PDT by
Dead Corpse
(I will not comply.)
To: Kaslin
agh. Can't STAND this headline. Why "future politicians"?--that means politicians yet to be elected. What this headline should say is "only if you can stop politicians from future confiscations of accumulated wealth" -- "future" should modify "confiscation" and not "politicians"--
Pelosi would confiscate this wealth at earliest opportunity, not some future replacement for this pernicious hag.
30 posted on
09/09/2013 11:48:39 AM PDT by
Mamzelle
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson