Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Syria says it "welcomes" Russian proposal to place chemical weapons under international control
CBS ^ | Sept 9, 2013 | CBS/AP

Posted on 09/09/2013 12:07:24 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: Blood of Tyrants
What is that on the floor? Oh, it’s just Obumbler’s credibility.

Must be something else .... Obumbler never had any to start with - can't lose what you don't have. :-)

41 posted on 09/09/2013 1:08:35 PM PDT by MissMagnolia (You see, truth always resides wherever brave men still have ammunition. I pick truth. (John Ransom))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik
"Now he either has to walk away despite his “red line” or still strike with no support."

If he were to attack now, under these circumstances, he would be judged a war criminal and spend the rest of his life after he is out of office looking over his shoulder for some EU Judge who wants to arrest him and put him on trial in the Hague.

42 posted on 09/09/2013 1:14:10 PM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Truth29
If he were to attack now, under these circumstances, he would be judged a war criminal and spend the rest of his life after he is out of office looking over his shoulder for some EU Judge who wants to arrest him and put him on trial in the Hague

You're being sarcastic right? After all, we're talking about somebody who was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for doing nothing. Somebody who was elected President of the United States after doing nothing.
43 posted on 09/09/2013 1:19:34 PM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader

While Zero plays silly card games like Spades - Putin plays for keeps.


44 posted on 09/09/2013 1:28:12 PM PDT by spokeshave (While Zero plays silly card games like Spades - Putin plays for keeps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: VerySadAmerican

Yes.

The State Department walked back Kerry’s statement, claiming Kerry “was making a rhetorical argument about the impossibility and unlikelihood of Assad turning over chemical weapons he has denied he used.”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3064533/posts


45 posted on 09/09/2013 1:37:50 PM PDT by kidd (No blood for ego)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

This is entirely uninforcable.

But it is guaranteed to make Obama look foolish on Tuesday, when he tries to make his case FOR war.


46 posted on 09/09/2013 1:40:25 PM PDT by kidd (No blood for ego)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen
That gets rid of that problem. They can sit there in the shrink wrap. No more excuse to bomb Syria.

Actually, the USA and Russia have special facilities for safe destruction of chemical weapons. I wouldn't be too surprised if Syrian CW is destroyed. Syria would have to pay for that, of course, but what else is new.

With regard to Assad hiding some CW, I don't think he will do it. CW today is of no use. It is only dangerous to the owner, by multiple routes. It needs maintenance, which takes money. Then it cannot be used without a major international scandal. Then you can be framed by rebels who either steal one of your CW bombs or who get another one from someone else. Then there is a chance of an accident or a terrorist act. Finally, enemy soldiers have adequate protection from CW and won't be seriously impacted if you use CW against them. However you examine it, CW is not very valuable. Having just one CW bomb only gives you all the disadvantages, and no advantages at all. It's like when an honest man finds and keeps a "hot gun" with the serial number removed. It only hurts him, and he can't use it for legitimate defense.

47 posted on 09/09/2013 1:43:54 PM PDT by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Assuming the UN is allowed to come into Syria on a grand scale and identify all the CW and perhaps Bio weapons etc., it is going to take boots on the ground, to protect them.
So who pray tell is going to volunteer military forces to watch over the UN inspectors.
Will the Russians offer to be the ones. If so, what happens when the al-Qaeda and other jihadist now in Syria and growing in numbers start to pick off Russian soldiers.
This is starting to become rather interesting.
48 posted on 09/09/2013 1:51:32 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Galt level is not far away......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion

Syria may have bought their weapons from the UK, but I don’t think it was Syria that launched them. I think it was the rebels, which consist of AQ and the MB, and they were supplied by the US via Benghazi along with many many short range missiles, and shoulder fired.

This is all about cleaning up a mess. The strategic targets will not be against Asad, but they will be to eliminate evidence. Especially with Hillary running in a couple of years. Ever wonder why Bubba is out supporting Hussien now?

My dad used to tell me, when in doubt, follow the money.

McCain and Hillary and Graham and all the rest, authorized the sale of these weapons to the rebels, and now want to hide the evidence.

The UN and Russia think the weapons came from rebels. I agree with them.


49 posted on 09/09/2013 2:12:24 PM PDT by esoxmagnum (The rats have been trained to pull the D voting lever to get their little food pellet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I think Obama will not accept any such offer. His supporters are trying to make out like the fact that this was floating is somehow indicative of the success of his policy. Quite the contrary. Thankfully, it will smash up his narrative for his “media offensive” today and tomorrow. All talk is of the Russian/Syrian offer.


50 posted on 09/09/2013 3:53:10 PM PDT by antiterrorist77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

While this is good news in that it will hopefully avert military action, it saves Obama’s hide.


Who cares about Obama? This does not put our military at risk and does not waste more of our military funding.

FWIW - politics are the last of my concern and if something saves our soldiers I support it even if it came from Putin. Obama’s brand has been damaged overseas by his inept handling of the Middle East, but nothing will stick to him with the presstitutes here at home.


51 posted on 09/09/2013 6:32:46 PM PDT by volunbeer (We must embrace austerity or austerity will embrace us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Who doesn’t have contempt for him among leaders of the world? But he’s a useful idiot for those who want America weakened.
I believe this was a crisis created to change the front pages and MSM attention away from the building antagonism toward Obamacare. It has worked beautifully.
Only one thing besides evading his responsibility for leading the country matters to him and that is putting medicine under government control 100%. I bet that was the deal he made with the Clintons in exchange for not sabotaging him. She will sweep in to the Presidency and be the savior who “fixes” Obamacare via the single payer plan.


52 posted on 09/11/2013 5:11:49 AM PDT by The Westerner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson