Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California city approves eminent domain for negative equity mortgages
Reuters ^ | 9/11/2013

Posted on 09/11/2013 3:14:27 AM PDT by markomalley

Richmond, California's leaders approved on Wednesday a plan for the city to become the first in the nation to use eminent domain to acquire mortgages with negative equity.

Eminent domain allows governments to seize private property for a public purpose. Critics say the plan threatens the market for private-label mortgage-backed securities.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: corruption; democrats; fraud; govtabuse; nannystate; tyranny
More from the SF Chronicle:

Tonight could determine whether Richmond proceeds with its controversial plan to use eminent domain to prevent foreclosures. The city so far has sent letters seeking to acquire 624 underwater mortgages at steep discounts, and has threatened that it might exercise eminent domain to seize them. It would then help the homeowners refinance into more-affordable loans.

At its regular meeting, the Richmond City Council is set to consider three different proposals that could determine whether the city backs away from the plan or moves forward.

  • Mayor Gayle McLaughlin, an avid backer of eminent domain, proposes that the city set up a  Joint Powers Authority to pursue eminent domain with other interested municipalities; confirm that it will not exercise eminent domain without a vote of the full City Council; and continue working with private San Francisco firm Mortgage Resolution Partners to resolve legal issues.
  • Councilmember Nat Bates, who now opposes the plan, along with Vice Mayor Booze, proposes that the city withdraw the offers it made in late July to purchase 624 underwater mortgages, and amend its agreement with MRP to eliminate the option of using eminent domain to acquire mortgages
  • Councilmember Jim Rogers wants the city to inform MRP that it must provide insurance to protect Richmond from litigation and damages related to eminent domain, or the plan will not proceed.

(snip)

So, in other words, get an irresponsible mortgage, have the government bail you out. What a country! (/sarc)

1 posted on 09/11/2013 3:14:27 AM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley

If they actually succeed at getting away with this, expect banks and mortgage companies to blacklist that area. Good luck on getting a loan for a new home.


2 posted on 09/11/2013 3:25:03 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

This mayor is a communist through and through. Just read her background on Wikipedia. She’s been bullying Chevron for some time and I would not be surprised if she tried to get them to pay for the mortgages one way or another.


3 posted on 09/11/2013 3:34:53 AM PDT by Thidwick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thidwick

Obviously she has far exceeded her level of competence. IOW, the voters ignored the Peter Principle when they elected her. Ignorant is one thing. Militant and ignorant is far worse.


4 posted on 09/11/2013 3:45:27 AM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

cool! I’m gonna buy the most expensive joint i can find, then not pay the mortgage, and the city will tax it’s middle class to death to pay for it for me!


5 posted on 09/11/2013 4:29:08 AM PDT by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meatloaf
She won by a handful of votes. Voters split the vote between several Democrats, and she squeaked through.

-PJ

6 posted on 09/11/2013 4:48:09 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

A direct effect of the TERRIBLE decision by SCOTUS regarding New London Connecticut.


7 posted on 09/11/2013 4:51:52 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

“...delinquent and performing “underwater” mortgages...”

Performing mortgages? Really?

Mortgages that are being paid properly are subject to this also?


8 posted on 09/11/2013 5:19:53 AM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

This is how liberals think:

My window broke. I tried to fix it by throwing rocks at it. I have a lot more broken windows now, but I’m confident I can fix those by throwing rocks at them, too. I got the idea from my neighbor, who sells me the rocks way below retail. He’s a really nice guy. I think I have a hemorrhoid, I wonder if he has any ideas...


9 posted on 09/11/2013 5:24:09 AM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

If I were a lender I’d be blacklisting that area NOW just for even suggesting that they were going to steal my property.


10 posted on 09/11/2013 5:28:29 AM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Given that they are exercising ED against the property (which is immoral IMO), I wonder how the IRS will treat the ‘windfall’ they get by having their mortgages reduced. Normally the IRS would consider that ‘income’.


11 posted on 09/11/2013 6:52:20 AM PDT by zeugma (Is it evil of me to teach my bird to say "here kitty, kitty"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
So, in other words, get an irresponsible mortgage, have the government bail you out. What a country!

Do you prefer this instead?...

"Issue a boatload of irresponsible mortgages and lose billions buying, selling, trading, and insuring them, then have the government bail you out. What a country!"

This little city government is perverting a legitimate concept (eminent domain) to fight an illegitimate power (big banking). Most likely their city will suffer while big banking continues to prosper.

As Dire Straits put it: "The man's too big, the man's too strong."
12 posted on 09/11/2013 7:24:26 AM PDT by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson