Posted on 09/16/2013 4:29:28 PM PDT by NYer
Not sure what your rant is there slick.
But what I do know is that the mom, er, grandmom is just gross.
I wonder if this mother/grandmother could tell? What a sad story.
Well, nobody’s making you bang where you barf, so no harm done, ok, Frat Boy?
Move along.
“What about the little creature she stole a life from?”
Oh, you mean “Mariah?” Granny even named her aborted (presumed) granddaughter I mean, this woman is sensitive! No life was ‘stolen,’ a spirit simply moved on.
Are you the only one? I don’t think so...
And you've proven what with that profound statement?
“...The parents - and there are TWO - who made the child are responsible for raising it..”
They are responsible but they will not raise a child.
“..If Grandma was any kind of a decent human being, she’d help...”
She is not.
Outcome and solution?
“...The parents - and there are TWO - who made the child are responsible for raising it..”
They are responsible but they will not raise a child.
“..If Grandma was any kind of a decent human being, she’d help...”
She is not.
Outcome and solution?
Profound?? Case closed...
I think that's how these sickos justify killing babies. Lord, help us!
Case closed? Ha! Just like a lib....so, YOU deem it closed? Swept under the rug...just like that. Color me surprised....NOT.
Maybe she looked much better 15 years ago.
Bordello. LOL
Some folks get better with age, some get worse. And some stay the same.
sickening creatures
Let me guess.. IQ is about 85?:-)
Such a nice, clever FReeper you are. Since you've brought IQ into the conversation..."let me guess" yours....70...or below? ;^)
According to MENSA, double than yours :-)
If, on the other hand, one is personally opposed, but has no objections to others aborting, the implication must be that they actually dont have any moral qualms about killing offspring. They are not interested themselves in having abortions, maybe because they want to have heirs, or they just enjoy kids, or they have a narcissistic yen to see concrete extensions of themselves. But if they had any moral objections, they should be willing to apply the principle in general. If its wrong for them, its wrong for others, too. Otherwise, they would be favoring a relativistic morality, in which it is impossible to say what is right or wrong. They could not even claim to be personally against because relativists are not consistently against any immoral practice. To paraphrase Kierkegaard: if it is sad to see persons hobbling around because of physical handicaps, it is even sadder to view people walking about without a conscience.
“...But if they had any moral objections, they should be willing to apply the principle in general. If its wrong for them, its wrong for others, too...”
Then we will end up with totalitarian society. Someone will decide for you how to live your life. History shows us again and again where we going to end up if individual liberties are not protected. Maybe you should care about thousands of children who killed every day around the world..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.