Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2016 Presidential Race: Rand Paul And Chris Christie Lead Republicans In New Hampshire
theglobaldispatch.com ^ | Sep 18th, 2013 | By Robert Herriman

Posted on 09/18/2013 10:47:21 PM PDT by BarnacleCenturion

Yes it’s only 2013, but the race for the Republican Presidential prospects for 2016 is alive and well, and this early on the two at the top in New Hampshire are Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) and New Jersey Republican Governor Chris Christie, according to a new Public Policy Polling (PPP) survey released Wednesday.

According to the poll, Paul and Christie are neck-and-neck in the Granite State garnering 20% and 19% of the vote, respectively.

Following the top two are Jeb Bush (14%), 12% for Kelly Ayotte, 10% for Ted Cruz, 7% for Marco Rubio and Paul Ryan, 3% for Bobby Jindal, and 2% for Rick Santorum.

(Excerpt) Read more at theglobaldispatch.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: jpsb
Palin also does not support mass deportations and never has.

And yet that does not equate to Rand Paul's Amnesty Plan now does it?

Primarily because Governor Palin has stated very publically that the complete fence needs to be built and has never come out against E-Verify. Whereas Rand Paul has stated unequivocally that he is against the use of E-Verify as a solution and nowhere has stated he wants a Fence, but is instead relying on the false, lying "Secure Border" certification by a congress that is comprised of 50% Open-Border Democrats and 25% Open-Border Republicans.

What is it with Rand Paul supporters that they try to wrap themselves in an Apple/Oranges comparison of Rand Paul and Governor Palin instead of admitting that their guy from a conservative perspective, is completely wrong on this issue?

Or are you really a big 'L' Libertarian and are just hunky-dory with Open Borders?

This is where the rubber
41 posted on 09/19/2013 8:59:47 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Cut off the bennies and they will leave on their own accord


42 posted on 09/19/2013 9:00:47 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: jpsb; Jim Robinson
Cruz and Paul’s position on illegals is identical. Dido Palin.

That is a flat-out lie.

Senator Cruz as emphatically stated he is against granting Amnesty to Illegals. Rand Paul, on the other hand, has put forth an Amnesty plan that "Normalizes" or grants legality (Amnesty) to 2 million Illegal Aliens (Undocumented Democrats) based on a "Certification" of congress that the border is secure. Mind you, Rand Paul, and everyone else knows, that each and every Democrat in Congress (50%) is a rabid Open-Borders shill and already thinks the Border is secure, and there are an additional 25% of the GOP that he can count on as well, to state that the border is secure.
43 posted on 09/19/2013 9:09:05 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; jpsb
This is where the rubber

That should have been:

This is where the rubber meets the road.
44 posted on 09/19/2013 9:10:44 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
"nowhere has stated he wants a Fence

Why do you continue to lie, lie, lie about Paul's positions?

"The Senate on Wednesday voted 61–37 to table an amendment to the immigration-reform bill that would have significantly strengthened the bill’s border-security and enforcement requirements. The so-called Trust but Verify amendment, offered by Senator Rand Paul (R., Ky.), would have given Congress, and not the Department of Homeland Security, the ultimate authority to determine if the border is effectively secure. It also included enhanced security measures, such as requiring a double-layer fence to be completed within five years, as well as a number of other triggers that must be implemented before illegal immigrants could be awarded legal status. “We desperately need immigration reform—but part of fixing the system is fixing our broken borders,” Paul said before the vote.

45 posted on 09/19/2013 9:12:25 AM PDT by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
no you are flat out lying, both Paul and Cruz would grant work visas (legal status) to qualifying illegals, Palin would too. Do some research before you embarrass your self more then you already have.

Here I will help you out with your research beginning at 3:40 Cruz himself says he would grant legal status to illegals. I like Ted Cruz, I would be very happy to support him for POTUS, but I really dislike people lying about another very good conservative Rand Paul. Stop the lies!

46 posted on 09/19/2013 9:40:11 AM PDT by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson