Skip to comments.
Lois Lerner, IRS official at heart of tea party scandal, retires
The Washington Times ^
| 9-23-13
| Stephen Dinan
Posted on 09/23/2013 12:26:25 PM PDT by sheikdetailfeather
Edited on 09/23/2013 12:27:17 PM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
The Internal Revenue Service said Monday that Lois G. Lerner, the woman at the center of the tea party targeting scandal, has resigned from the agency
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bye; corruption; democrats; fraud; irs; lerner; loislerner; retires; scandal; scandals; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
To: sheikdetailfeather
Hopefully, she’ll look good in orange.
21
posted on
09/23/2013 12:35:02 PM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
To: sheikdetailfeather
Does she continue to get her pension (our money) if she's living in Club Fed for the next 20 years?
Leni
To: SeekAndFind
That’s what I was wondering. We The Harassed get to continue to pay her fat federal pension.
23
posted on
09/23/2013 12:36:37 PM PDT
by
jtal
(Runnin' a World in Need with White Folks' Greed - since 1492)
To: sheikdetailfeather
And the RINOs sweep the whole matter undr the rug.
24
posted on
09/23/2013 12:36:39 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(From time to time the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots.)
To: Las Vegas Dave
David Brook is looking for a new CFO, she will have to double as a body guard LOL
25
posted on
09/23/2013 12:37:12 PM PDT
by
crosslink
(Moderates should play in the middle of a busy street)
To: sheikdetailfeather
though because of privacy rules it could say nothing more Oh Right.
Her privacy is Sacred.
The privacy of "teabaggers" and "right wing extremists" as she and her ilk refer to anyone to the right of Joe Stalin is entirely negotiable, and usually ignored.
To: SeekAndFind
“And how much does she gets in pension?”
I’m a fed retiree myself (Defense Dept., FAA) and based on her grade and likely years of service, I would guess somewhere in the neighborhood of 85K-95K/yr. An educated guess.
To: livius
Now that she is no longer an IRS employee, I wonder if all the tea party groups she screwed can sue her?
28
posted on
09/23/2013 12:39:59 PM PDT
by
Bronzewound
(Lost Hope & Loose Change)
To: sheikdetailfeather
And she though that she was going to get immunity in exchange for any cooperation. Looks more like the length of her sentencing will be based on any cooperation she can provide in nailing anyone at the White House.
29
posted on
09/23/2013 12:47:24 PM PDT
by
Hotlanta Mike
("Governing a great nation is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu)
To: sheikdetailfeather
Great. This hag gets to live like a fat rat off the taxpayers dime for the rest of her days.
30
posted on
09/23/2013 12:54:56 PM PDT
by
4yearlurker
(Democrats + Unions + Corruption= Detroit.)
To: Signalman
RE: I would guess somewhere in the neighborhood of 85K-95K/yr. An educated guess.
Sheeesh, I can understand why she retired. With that kind of pension, I’d retire too. Why endure all the aggravation?
Now, what we really need is to make sure she doesn’t get to enjoy retirement for what she did. What about calling her back to the witness stand?
To: LibLieSlayer
32
posted on
09/23/2013 1:10:23 PM PDT
by
livius
To: Bronzewound
I don’t know if she can be sued for something she did in the course of her job. I think she could go to jail for it, though...
33
posted on
09/23/2013 1:11:28 PM PDT
by
livius
To: livius
34
posted on
09/23/2013 1:25:49 PM PDT
by
Bronzewound
(Lost Hope & Loose Change)
To: livius
35
posted on
09/23/2013 1:43:49 PM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
To: livius
Why not. Obama’s administration has thrown her under the bus and stated that there actions were taken without their approval (i.e. that they didn't order her to treat conservative groups differently). It seems to me she went beyond the scope of her employment and as such is liable for her actions on a civil basis. Her defense would be that she was probably following orders. Someone needs to make her admit it.
36
posted on
09/23/2013 2:21:38 PM PDT
by
burghguy
To: sheikdetailfeather
Lerner should be swapping recipes with Manning and Hasan at Leavenworth.
37
posted on
09/23/2013 2:30:36 PM PDT
by
VRWC For Truth
(Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
To: sheikdetailfeather
38
posted on
09/23/2013 2:48:49 PM PDT
by
CPT Clay
(Follow me on Twitter @Clay N TX)
To: All
unless she’s on a witness stand pointing her finger at Obama, she useless.
39
posted on
09/23/2013 2:49:50 PM PDT
by
newnhdad
(Our new motto: USA, it was fun while it lasted.)
To: sheikdetailfeather
The article states “Her departure marks the first person to pay a significant price in the scandal”.
I’ve no idea how old she is, but she’s no spring chicken that’s for sure. So, what is the ‘significant price’? I’m sure she has a comfortable federal pension. I suggest some jail time.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson