http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL32528.pdf
and others.
In a legal sense, Kerry’s signature isn’t worth a bucket of warm spit. But there are those who will proceed as if it carries the weight of law. And may even convince some leftist judge to agree, setting a precedent.
Stay vigilant and stock up.
“Kerry’s signature isn’t worth a bucket of warm spit”
It carries weight in that is signifies to the UN that the US President will now carry this to the US Senate for ratification. They have the votes in the Senate.
The workaround the Constitution is that it doesn’t outright ban weapons but it does setup a registry of all weapon owners and we all know the US Supreme Court will uphold such a registry as something that doesn’t prohibit bearing arms. We also know the US Supreme Court has ruled ANYTHING goes as long as it is in a form of a tax. Therefore, the treaty will be implemented as a tax; buy a gun, pay a tax, etc. Own a gun, pay a tax. In fact, just last year there was an IRS 1040 change being tossed around about paying taxes on firearms.