Been there... 
done that in Nam--
Posted on 09/25/2013 1:00:54 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
One machine gun, but two 30mms and two grenade launchers? Odd.
Those are captured German “Goliath’s”.
Many were used on the D-Day invasion beaches, but most failed because the command cables were severed by the incredible artillery barrage.
In many places, German units removed the explosives, and used them as Combat Ammo carriers, instead of the mobile mine they were designed for.
Is that for real, and where did it come from?
Twin 30s would burn up a lot of ammo on buildings. I think this is another “Be Everything” vehicle. Doesn’t carry dismounts, though.
Dunno - putting two A-10’s together ??
Russians are doing what we should do—designing more armored vehicles.
>>>Nizhny Tagil and Chelyabinsk were the two big Soviet tank targets for our recon during the Cold War.<<<
I don’t think Chelyabisnsk has made any tanks after 1946.
In fact Russia has two major centers for tank-building: Nizhniy Taghil (UVZ company - a builder and developer of T-72) and Omsk (Omsktransmash company - a builder of a T-80 tank which is a radical update of T-64 left over in Ukraine along with a Harkiv tank plant).
It’s notable that T-72 was developed as a cheap unrelated alternative to a T-64 which has entered service in 1967 and never exported outside USSR. Originally, T-72 was made for Warsaw pact and 3rd World nations.
By late 1976 T-64 has developed into T-80 (as much over engineered and never exported as well), and T-72 evolved into a T-90 by earlier 1990s.
Both T-64 and T-80 were by all means a superb designs of it’s time but Soviet military has eyed an export model T-72 for it’s price and maintenance costs. They simply fond it unnecessary to have an over engineered superior tank in a WW III European theater with an estimated lifetime of minutes for any tank.
It made sense because as for 1987 a T-72 was priced at 340,000 to 420,000 rubles (with more or less advanced fire control and protection suites making the most difference) and T-80 has started from 830,000 and up to 1,150,000. A gas-turbine engine alone for T-80 was over 100,000 rubles comparing to 15,000 for a T-72 power plant.
AFAIK by late 2000s Omsktransmash is out of business completely with it’s price politics and their future tank R&D was bought by UVZ to simplify and incorporate some technologies into both T-90 and own future tank.
"Hasta La Vista Baby!"
>>>Twin 30s would burn up a lot of ammo on buildings. I think this is another “Be Everything” vehicle. Doesn’t carry dismounts, though.<<<
In fact so-called Terminator or BMPT is not new. UVZ is marketing it for many years based on an experience of the First Chechen War there an entire armored brigade was trapped and destroyed by jihadis in a city. This one is specifically designed for urban environment to deal with threats like RPG-teams on high-rises etc.
That sounds like the development trail of the 2S9.
A 120mm gun on a BMD chassis, that could elevate past 50 degrees. The Soviets needed it in Afghanistan.
Russians are building new wheeled IFV with 57 mm gun.
>>>That sounds like the development trail of the 2S9.
A 120mm gun on a BMD chassis, that could elevate past 50 degrees. The Soviets needed it in Afghanistan.<<<
Yes, but it is not the best solution for urban mission profile.
I think UVZ has to grant a few Terminators to Assad’s forces to evaluate.
Judging by youtube videos they have a perfect environment to prove if it’s concept worthy or not.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.