Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GeronL

Of course they are not. Now we are talking about a tactical aspect and combat reform. Do you think “dynmicpara” makes sense or not?


9 posted on 09/25/2013 9:33:46 PM PDT by cunning_fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: cunning_fish

When you invade a puny country without a real army, any doctrine would probably work. That one makes a lot of sense, with an emphasis on protecting the mechanized infantry. Light infantry is for clean up. I get that.

Can that be scaled up for combat with a real competitor country? How would it work as defense if an army crossed their border from, say China?


10 posted on 09/25/2013 9:41:47 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: cunning_fish

If you are on the other end of that, how would you counter it?


11 posted on 09/25/2013 9:47:31 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson