Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Calif. law will require OT for domestic workers
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | September 26, 2013 | By LAURA OLSON

Posted on 09/26/2013 7:42:24 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

Gov. Jerry Brown on Thursday signed a bill that will temporarily require overtime pay for domestic workers in California, after he vetoed a broader measure last year that critics said would have opened the door for government regulation of part-time baby-sitting.

"Domestic workers are primarily women of color, many of them immigrants, and their work has not been respected in the past," the bill's author, Democratic Assemblyman Tom Ammiano of San Francisco, said in a statement. "Now, they will be entitled to overtime, like just about every other California working person."

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: domestichelp; householdhelp; mexifornia; overtime; work

1 posted on 09/26/2013 7:42:24 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

That will cost a few more jobs and cause some hours to be cut...gee..who woulda guessed?


2 posted on 09/26/2013 7:46:01 PM PDT by austinaero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

It is truly a testament to the Democrat party what they chose to focus on, and what they chose not to avoid focusing on.


3 posted on 09/26/2013 7:47:18 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (This post coming to you today from behind the Camelskin Curtain. Not the Iron or Bamboo Curtain...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

These people never learn.

And everyone but them pays the price.


4 posted on 09/26/2013 7:48:36 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (....Let It Burn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

OT?

How about 29 hours?


5 posted on 09/26/2013 7:49:22 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"Domestic workers are primarily women of color, many of them immigrants, and their work has not been respected in the past," the bill's author, Democratic Assemblyman Tom Ammiano of San Francisco, said in a statement. "Now, they will be entitled to overtime, like just about every other California working person."

This is an statewide employment law for everyone, why do they have to make it sound like part of a race war?

6 posted on 09/26/2013 7:49:27 PM PDT by ansel12 ( 'I'm on That New Obama Diet... Every Day I Let Vladimir Putin Eat My Lunch' .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I thought people who are on salary are not entitled to overtime pay.

I thought domestic workers are on salary, at least the live-in ones.

So if this stands, everyone on salary will be entitled to overtime pay?

Not to mention that domestic employment provides a way to earn a living for those who may not qualify for other jobs, but are decent and are willing to work.

Now people will think twice about hiring domestics.


7 posted on 09/26/2013 7:50:13 PM PDT by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

what they often do is Ms. Hernandez watches the kids of Ms. Sanchez and vice-versa —this way they’re both “working” and can be paid.

They’ll even do it in the same room.

Really common scam.

We are PAYING Mexican moms to watch their own kids.

Maybe we’ll pay their men to pleasure themselves, or to watch TV?


8 posted on 09/26/2013 7:50:20 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

***”Domestic workers are primarily women of color, many of them immigrants, and their work has not been respected in the past,”***

‘Their’ work hasn’t been respected? Well, Tommy, maybe that’s because these ‘immigrants’ disrespected Federal law and, by extension, the American citizen in the first place.


9 posted on 09/26/2013 7:50:47 PM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

And CA unemployment rate is almost 9%:

California adds 29,100 jobs; state unemployment rate ticks up to 8.9%

http://www.latimes.com/business/money/la-fi-mo-california-unemployment-jobs-20130920,0,7733287.story


10 posted on 09/26/2013 7:51:54 PM PDT by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Good point.
If you are salaried, there is no over time.
You are paid for working whether it takes one hour or seventy in a week.


11 posted on 09/26/2013 7:53:48 PM PDT by svcw (obama lied my plan died)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
<This is an statewide employment law for everyone, why do they have to make it sound like part of a race war?>


Because if they stop talking about racism, it'll cease to exist. And we can't stop talking about division and racism. How else would they get elected?


Morgan Freeman says it best. He is a typical Hollywood socialist, I know. But his views on race are outstanding. Check out the link.
YouTube
12 posted on 09/26/2013 8:03:33 PM PDT by MN.Gruber06
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
I thought people who are on salary are not entitled to overtime pay.

It varies from state to state, and the Federal wage law also applies in many cases. Even on salary, some jobs are covered by the wage law and must be paid overtime when they exceed 40 hours, and there are some jobs considered "professional" to which the wage law is forbidden to apply.

The idea is that employers can't circumvent minimum wage by simply claiming people are "salaried" and them forcing them to work 50 or 60 hours a week.

13 posted on 09/26/2013 8:06:25 PM PDT by FredZarguna (With bell, book, and candle, please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

‘Maybe we’ll pay their men to pleasure themselves’

And to think that I have been doing that for years for nothing.

With overtime pay, I should be rich by now!


14 posted on 09/26/2013 8:08:47 PM PDT by Delta Dawn (Fluent in two languages: English and cursive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

California, lol.


15 posted on 09/26/2013 8:08:47 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: svcw

There are very strict rules as to what type of employee can be put on salary w/o overtime.


16 posted on 09/26/2013 8:28:28 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“temporarily?” Is that anything like those “temporary” taxes that are enacted?


17 posted on 09/26/2013 8:29:56 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Could say the Governor’s domestic get overtime for time spent servicing him?


18 posted on 09/26/2013 8:34:22 PM PDT by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"Domestic workers are primarily women of color, many of them immigrants, and their work has not been respected in the past," the bill's author, Democratic Assemblyman Tom Ammiano of San Francisco, said in a statement. "Now, they will be entitled to overtime, like just about every other California working person."

The "women of color" will just get less hours.

If a carload of guys pulled up as Democratic Assemblyliar Tom Ammiano was walking out the door, and beat his teeth into the back of his lying face, I probably would nervously clap.

19 posted on 09/26/2013 8:59:21 PM PDT by kiryandil (turning Americans into felons, one obnoxious drunk at a time (Zero Tolerance!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“Democratic Assemblyman Tom Ammiano of San Francisco”

Ammiano is singlehandedly turning California into a broke sewer. He has introduced more radical “progressive” legislation than the rest of Sacramento combined.


20 posted on 09/26/2013 9:08:04 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

My husband is a material scientist, if he received over time we would be stik’n rich.
He loves his job, and always had....what he and his team have done would have NEVER have happened if they had to worry about the clock.


21 posted on 09/26/2013 9:15:24 PM PDT by svcw (obama lied my plan died)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

When I was in college I nannyed for some people, I loved the job, took care of really great kids, had hours where they were in school allowed me to do homework and tidy up....if my employers had to worry about overtime I would have never been hired.


22 posted on 09/26/2013 9:17:28 PM PDT by svcw (obama lied my plan died)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: svcw

Yes, what should be a private agreement between the employer and worker that benefits them both will now be regulated by gov’t and most likely unionized. No one will benefit.


23 posted on 09/26/2013 9:36:57 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Will they be paid OT while having sex with the man of the house? If so, the state of California might owe Arnold’s maid some back pay.


24 posted on 09/26/2013 9:39:09 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican (".....Barrack, and the horse Mohammed rode in on.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

So if they are live-in will their year end W-2 or 1099 include the value of their housing and food?

I’m sure all of these “employers” in California check their employees out through EVerify, always file W-2’s and W-3 for their employees and pay their half of the SS and Medicare tax. /s/


25 posted on 09/26/2013 9:48:05 PM PDT by Grams A (The Sun will rise in the East in the morning and God is still on his throne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Grams A

Are these workers all “unionized” thus allowing them OT?
Yet another Kaliforniastan speaks.


26 posted on 09/27/2013 2:57:55 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Progov

It would seem that this issue raises a lot more questions than answers. Could be a huge cash injection for the unions - but that would mean all these people, most of whom are probably paid in cash, would have to come out of the shadows.

Just don’t see anything good coming out of all of this.


27 posted on 09/27/2013 7:14:24 AM PDT by Grams A (The Sun will rise in the East in the morning and God is still on his throne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

How to create “income inequality” and unemployment 123.


28 posted on 09/27/2013 9:51:05 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson