Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/28/2013 5:03:39 AM PDT by rellimpank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rellimpank

Abortion is the law. It is a stench in the nostrils of God. This government is an instrument of the ungodly to wield power against God and His people. “We must obey God rather than men.” (Acts 5:29)


2 posted on 09/28/2013 5:12:19 AM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

“It’s the law of the land.”

So was:

slavery
men only voting
prohibition
segregation

I am sure there are more things that WERE the law of the land, but just those few are examples that laws are not immovable brick walls.


3 posted on 09/28/2013 5:12:19 AM PDT by EBH ( Freeman: A person not in slavery or serfdom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

In a country as large as this with so many resources, material and human, it is unfathomable that just a few “wacko birds” have so much power. Obama, Reid, Boehner. Bringing America to it’s knees. But we wil rise and many are waking up finally.


4 posted on 09/28/2013 5:19:02 AM PDT by MomwithHope (Buy and read The Liberty Amendments by Mark Levin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

conversely, if there is no law......... there is no law

Obama promotes his own demise


5 posted on 09/28/2013 5:22:07 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Travon... Felony assault and battery hate crime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

If it wouldn’t be a waste of time, someone might point out to Harry that the Constitution is the ultimate, fundamental “law of the land”, and that the founders deliberately put the power of the purse in the hands of House of Representatives as one of many purposeful exercises of separation of power, specifically designed to provide the people’s representatives a means to counter abuses by the other branches.

That sotted s. o. b. certainly doesn’t worry about the “law of the land” every time BO decides to ignore it.


7 posted on 09/28/2013 5:28:11 AM PDT by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

We WILL not give up our right to be King.

The mob has spoken.


8 posted on 09/28/2013 5:28:41 AM PDT by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Obama: the bearded lady of the Muslim Brotherhood))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank
"It's the law of the land."

Yes, well, so was slavery. And it was effectively upheld by the Supreme Court. Just like obamacare...

10 posted on 09/28/2013 5:37:10 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank
I know a great many self-described members of the Tea Party, and I've yet to meet one who would not acknowledge -- admittedly with dismay -- that Obamacare is the law. Nor have I met one unwilling to concede that the Supreme Court ruled that Obamacare is constitutional.

To be precise (on an existential legal issue such as ObamaCare, one must be precise), the Supreme Court ruled that ObamaCare was not unconstitutional under the objections presented. That in no way means that ObamaCare is constitutional, nor does it obligate the Court to rule in favor of that law if it hears a case based on a different constitutional objection.

11 posted on 09/28/2013 5:39:56 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

Does this mean they’ll STFU about the Second Amendment? Didn’t think so.


12 posted on 09/28/2013 5:41:55 AM PDT by ryan71 (The Partisans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

I have started posting conservative stories and viewpoints on Reddit. Must expose these lefties to conservative point of views. Check it out over there.


15 posted on 09/28/2013 6:16:49 AM PDT by republicangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank
It's the law of the land."

If it's the law of the land, then please explain how it changed be changed, delayed, or ignored any time this POS administration decides it needs to do so.

17 posted on 09/28/2013 6:41:37 AM PDT by Common Sense 101 (Hey libs... If your theories fly in the face of reality, it's not reality that's wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

people flooding into the country illegally is against the law... we don’t obey that

possessing or smoking pot is against federal law... it’s not enforced in CA and many other states

hiring illegals to work in your company is against the law.. we do nothing about it

‘selling’ automatic weapons to known drug dealers is against the law... we do it anyhow

laundering money from said drug dealers is against the law... we do it anyhow

killing babies born alive is against the law... we fund those doctors with federal money

i could go on. end result, i won’t be party to the bankruptcy of my country through ‘indentured participation’


18 posted on 09/28/2013 6:44:35 AM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

19 posted on 09/28/2013 7:26:51 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson