ATF tries to block whistleblowing agent’s ‘Fast and Furious’ book

The Washington Times ^ | 10/13/13 | John Solomon

[don-o]

The ACLU decided to get involved.

Seems odd to me that the author would just let it ride since July.

[agere_contra]

banking, big pharma, safe foods, rational environmentalism, reducing foreign policy adventurism, Internet freedom, safe neighborhoods, better schools and access to higher education, reduction of the power of lobbyists

At best the Left pay only lip service to most of those.

For instance: they don't want better schools, they want entrenched and secure teacher-unions.

Ask Zimmerman how much the Left care about safe neighborhoods.

Ask the Libyans, the Yemenis and the Syrians how much the Left care about Foreign Policy.

And as for limiting lobbyists - this White House put them all on salary!

[Cyber Liberty]

Not very odd to me. When you’re almost universally ignored by the press and 99% of the people in the country have never heard of you, it’s pretty hard to get any traction.

[neverdem]

BTTT!

[cherokee1]

I’m pretty sure every court in the country would shield the BATF from getting its feeling hurt. They’d better have more than that to whine about. HEY -—ATF-—just come clean on F&F and the book won’t be a problem for you.

[hitkicker]

Are they even trying to claim the book is untruthful?

Their "reason" for blocking publication pretty much guarantees that the book is truthful. They're obviously afraid of it.