Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Air Force cargo planes fly straight into mothballs
foxnews.com ^ | 10/7/13 | daytondailynews

Posted on 10/07/2013 12:18:03 PM PDT by ColdOne

There's nothing wrong with the C-27J, it's just that the Pentagon doesn't want it given budget constraints.

The Pentagon is sending $50 million cargo planes straight from the assembly line to mothballs because it has no use for them, yet it still hasn’t stopped ordering the aircraft, according to a report.

A dozen nearly new Italian-built C-27J Spartans have been shipped to an Air Force facility in Arizona dubbed “the boneyard,” and five more currently under construction are likely headed for the same fate, according to an investigation by the Dayton Daily News. The Air Force has spent $567 million on 21 of the planes since 2007, according to purchasing officials at Dayton’s Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. Of those, 16 have been delivered – with almost all sent directly to Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Tucson, where some 4,400 aircraft and 13 aerospace vehicles, with a total value of more than $35 billion, sit unused.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: aerospace; bhodod; cargo; defensespending; usaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: zot

Son of C-123 ping


41 posted on 10/07/2013 2:09:19 PM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change; All

“Very efficient. No operating costs, no repairs before retirement, just straight to the boneyard. Next year they can be chopped up and sold for scrap metal.”

I have a more efficient idea yet - pay the manufacturers NOT to make aircraft. It is the ultimate in JIT manufacturing. Think how “green” that would be! This is not as crazy as it sounds, we have been doing the same in agriculture for decades, paying farmers not to plant crops.


42 posted on 10/07/2013 2:15:01 PM PDT by TexasRepublic (Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

Form follows function.

I flew in the Provider. Drafty, noisy thing but it could get in and out of short runways.


43 posted on 10/07/2013 2:26:16 PM PDT by SargeK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FAA

US Coast Guard is hoping to get the cast-offs. C-27’s would suit their mission and they are paid for. I think?


44 posted on 10/07/2013 2:26:52 PM PDT by BatGuano (You don't think I'd go into combat with loose change in my pocket, do ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SargeK

..I did the “milk run” in C-130’s (in and out)...they should have given us popcorn when we finally hit the ground and got off.....*grin*..pilots knew we partied the night before.


45 posted on 10/07/2013 2:32:06 PM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

Thanks for the ping. I think the Air Force didn’t want this bird in the first place.


46 posted on 10/07/2013 2:41:13 PM PDT by zot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Yeah, since the government has a.) unlimited access to freshly printed money, b.) unlimited access to unlimited borrowing, and c.) unlimited access to your and my bank accounts - why should anyone worry about a few million dollars wasted here or there?


47 posted on 10/07/2013 2:49:49 PM PDT by Arlis (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne; GeronL

Actually, IMHO, this report does not speak to the real issues for the C-27 removal. it really had nothing to do with the shutdown and their placement in the boneyard was not a result of it. In fact, it predates it significantly.

Here is a short history of the C-27 bid and how it came to be.

In 2005 the U.S. Army had identified the need to replace the C-23 Sherpa medium lift aircraft. That aircraft’s performance was simply not suited for the hot, high terrain of Southwest Asia. Alenia Aeronautica offered the C-27 into the resulting competition to address this issue.

Lockheed Martin chose to offer the C-130J in 2006 as a contender in the same U.S. Army and U.S. Air Force Joint Cargo Aircraft (JCA) competition. Alenia Aeronautica first paired with L-3 Communications to form the Global Military Aircraft Systems (GMAS) joint venture to market the C-27. Later, Boeing joined Alenia and L-3 Communications as a GMAS team member.

The C-27 completed the U.S. Department of Defense’s Early User Survey evaluations by November 2006, flying 26 hours and surpassing all the JCA program requirements. The GMAS team announced that the C-27 would be assembled at a facility at Cecil Field, Duval County, Florida.

The final selection of the JCA came on 13 June 2007, when the Pentagon selected the C-27 as its Joint Cargo Aircraft. A contract worth US$2.04 billion was awarded to the L-3 Communications team for 78 C-27s along with training and support on 13 June 2007. At that time, the U.S. Army had requirement for up to 75 aircraft in the Army National Guard; the Air Force had a requirement for up to 70 aircraft in the Air Force Special Operations Command and the Air National Guard.

On 22 June 2007, the award of the JCA contract to the Alenia C-27 was formally protested. On 27 September 2007, the GAO announced that it had denied the protest, thereby allowing the Pentagon to go ahead with the C-27 procurement. The first flight of a U.S. C-27 occurred on 17 June 2008. The United States military officially received its first C-27 on 25 September 2008...over five years ago. In September 2008 L-3 Link officially began classes at the Georgia Army National Guard Flight Facility, Robins Air Force Base, Georgia for C-27 training. In April 2009, the U.S. Army had accepted deliveries of two aircraft and had 11 more on order. A proposal in May 2009 was made to have the U.S. Army/Army National Guard relinquish all of its aircraft to the U.S. Air Force, primarily the Air National Guard, with a reduction to 38 aircraft. This led the DoD to give total control of the US’s C-27Js to the USAF in December 2009.

By July 2010, the U.S. Air National Guard had received four C-27s and began using them for testing and training. The purchase of all 38 Spartans was anticipated with initial operational capability expected by October 2010. The U.S. Air Force planned the C-27’s first combat deployment for summer 2011.

In August 2011, two C-27 aircraft flown by Air National Guard personnel began operations at Kandahar Air Field, Afghanistan. From August to December 2011, the C-27s of the 179th Airlift Wing transported some 400 tons of cargo, and over 6,900 passengers in more than 900 missions.

However, and nonetheless, by early 2012, the USAF moved to cancel the program entirely. On 26 January 2012, the U.S. Department of Defense announced plans to remove all 38 C-27s on order from the U.S. Air Force’s inventory because it was determined that over the long haul, their niche capabilities would too expensive. It was announced that the C-27’s duties were to be taken by the U.S. Air Force’s C-130s.

In February 2012, Alenia warned that it would not provide support for C-27s resold by the United States.

Then, in March 2012, it was reported that the U.S. Coast Guard was considering taking over the aircraft from the U.S. Air Force.

On 23 March 2012, the U.S. Air Force announced that it would cut all C-27s from its inventory in fiscal year 2013 after determining that its per-aircraft lifecycle costs are higher than those of C-130J aircraft performing the same combat resupply mission. In July 2012 the entire fleet was grounded due to a flight control system failure.

By early 2013, the USAF was continuing to shut down the program. At that time, over 9 months ago, newly built C-27Js were being sent directly to the Davis–Monthan Air Force Base boneyard. This was to make room for C-130s. The Coast Guard and other civil, or allied services will be able to bid on and take up these aircraft as desired.

So, the shutdown had nothing to do with this...it had been started almost a year ago for the reasons listed. Overall life time costs, maintenance costs, the C-130J being able to do the mission, etc. Now the C-27s are available for other departments (like the Coast Guard) or allies to pick them up and use them.


48 posted on 10/07/2013 3:19:23 PM PDT by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Does anyone remember the VH-71?


49 posted on 10/07/2013 3:32:08 PM PDT by Garvin (When it comes to my freedom, there will be no debate. There will be a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

I didn’t think this had to do with the shutdown, i blamed general government inefficiency. Thanks for the post


50 posted on 10/07/2013 3:41:34 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change
Donate them to Mexico to ship drugs to the U.S. Eliminate the leaky home built subs and desert backpackers and such.

Be on the lookout for pilots with calves the size of cantaloupes.

51 posted on 10/07/2013 4:00:27 PM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Did the government really order those planes on their own or were they planes that were ordered to placate some congressman’s district? I know a lot of these programs are ran as a payoff to constituents a (Jobs Producer) if you will...


52 posted on 10/07/2013 5:19:29 PM PDT by ColdSteelTalon (Light is fading to shadow, and casting its shroud over all we have known...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vette6387

“But then FIAT now owns Ferrari and Lamborghini and they are definitely not in the FIAT category.”

In 58 we had to ballance a 4.9 Farrari engine and it was the biggest piece of shit I ever worked on!


53 posted on 10/07/2013 5:27:42 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
Awesome aircraft and yet another bonehead move by my beloved USAF to ditch them.

Yet another good reason to ditch the USAF.
54 posted on 10/07/2013 5:34:28 PM PDT by rottndog ('Live Free Or Die' Ain't just words on a bumber sticker...or a tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: zot

If the Army was wanting it to take the load off the Chinooks is true; then the USAF played its old “all fixed wing aircraft are owned by the Air Force” card again.


55 posted on 10/07/2013 5:35:55 PM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary

We haven’t had capitalism for well over 100 years that hasn’t been tainted by progressives and their socialist puke.

How right you are!!!

We are closer to fascism nowadays.


56 posted on 10/07/2013 5:41:07 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Doogle
I always loved to watch the Caribou come land in Chu Lai.
Their approach was very steep and they just seemed to hang in the sky.

Can someone fix the size of the pic, I haven't learned how to do that.
Thanks.


57 posted on 10/07/2013 5:52:15 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: tet68
Like this?

<img border=0 src="http://club.coolamonrotary.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Caribou-Landing.jpg"height=400>

58 posted on 10/07/2013 6:14:23 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (It's hard to accept the truth when the lies were exactly what you wanted to hear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Thank you so much for posting that info.


59 posted on 10/08/2013 9:05:30 AM PDT by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11) Hey, Harry Reid.. 1-800-318-2596!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson