Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul Backs Cuccinelli, Snubs Libertarian Sarvis
http://www.newsmax.com ^ | Saturday, 12 Oct 2013 11:44 AM | By Sandy Fitzgerald

Posted on 10/13/2013 8:08:21 AM PDT by Maelstorm

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-56 last
To: DanZ

Millions of the votes Perot received were from people who wouldn’t have voted anyway because of the excitement of the Perot circus. Without Bush, Perot wouldn’t have happened.


51 posted on 10/14/2013 11:28:34 PM PDT by Fresh Wind (The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BeadCounter

>> Don’t need a second of time to think about NOT supporting the anti-life pot smoking gay marriage libertarian party,

We don’t say democrats when referring to Democrats.

Your beef is with the Libertarian Party and the yahoos that subscribe to it. A libertarian does not intrinsically support the things on your list.


52 posted on 10/14/2013 11:29:49 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

Someone only talked of the Libertarian Party and their platform is online. Nobody ever mentioned individual libertarians but it’s a long time since one expected those associated with the libertarian cause to be reasonable and Gary Johnson pulled his 2% or however much of the national vote.


53 posted on 10/15/2013 4:18:30 AM PDT by BeadCounter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

Ron has endorsed Cuccinelli before. His biggest fault in my opinion is he unlike his son was never interested in winning or making sure his message wasn’t construed to be isolationist.


54 posted on 10/15/2013 11:45:46 AM PDT by Maelstorm (The political class love diversity and choice only when the its choices they approve of.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ksm1
Seriously, all of this “he’s a RINO, she’s a RINO” talk is getting excessive.

No, what's excessive is the number of RNC apparatchiks who are RINOs.

55 posted on 10/15/2013 3:28:47 PM PDT by Guttlekraw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Guttlekraw

I don’t necessarily disagree, but I find it ironic that people who were praised in 2010 are suddenly RINOs now. I don’t think I agree with anyone 100% of the time. I don’t think that makes them a RINO though.


56 posted on 10/15/2013 8:05:44 PM PDT by ksm1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson