Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Chevy Impala That Goes 500 Miles On A Tank? With Natural Gas, It's Possible
Forbes ^ | 10/16/2013 | Joann Muller

Posted on 10/17/2013 6:06:17 AM PDT by thackney

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-149 next last
To: American Constitutionalist
You go to many gas stations you see with the regular gas a pump hose for diesel.

As soon as diesel got popular they jacked the price up and put more and more restrictions on it, nah , there is nothing they would do to natural gas to tax it or any restrictions once it got popular.

61 posted on 10/17/2013 7:49:59 AM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Hardraade

“That can be worked around, by doing the thing modular. Keep two tanks, one being always recharged. Load charged tank instead of charging the car.”

That sounds much simpler than stopping at a gas station. And very convenient for apartment dwellers too! Sounds like fueling the space shuttle. And those talks generally take up the whole trunk.


62 posted on 10/17/2013 7:54:30 AM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion
The boomerang effect on the economy.
The economy and businesses are waiting just for that.... a business friendly government and administration.
The only thing that is keeping America's economy afloat is the revolution of fracking and oil shale.
There are business even setting up manufacturing here in the USA because the cost of production, electricity and raw materials are cheaper because of the plentiful natural gas.
The by products of natural gas and oil are raw materials that can be used to make things and production.
63 posted on 10/17/2013 7:54:44 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

“Who says it has to be one big tank ? “

Crumple zones, car accidents, sparks, and safety pretty much.
Since it would add to weight to use the wasted space and have a reasonable amount of built in safety in tanks in those wasted spaces, it’s “best” to have one tank, reasonably protected somewhere low and central.
But still, I hear ya on the wasted space.


64 posted on 10/17/2013 7:55:39 AM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free..... Even robots will kill for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: BwanaNdege

If it wasn’t designed as a box and more aerodynamic it would even get better gas mileage.


65 posted on 10/17/2013 7:56:05 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

yeah,,fill the quarter panels with fuel, wear an asbestos suit for the accidents.


66 posted on 10/17/2013 7:58:56 AM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

Technology has vastly improved in the last 34 years since that Vega was built.

It seems that technology has reduced the fuel mileage of vehicles and introduced alcohol fuel which is detrimental to older vehicles. I live in the mountains and since the floods I have to drive 4X4 roads about 10 miles to get out. These compressed fuels would be much more dangerous and impossible to use in some of my vehicles.


67 posted on 10/17/2013 7:59:43 AM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist; BwanaNdege

*NNyuggg!*
Yeah.
Add to that realm of ugly the Scion xB [xtra Boxy?] and the Cube.
Whoever designed those things needs to be beaten with a Pontiac Aztec bumper.


68 posted on 10/17/2013 7:59:46 AM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free..... Even robots will kill for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: robert14

“The compressor cost $10,000 and takes 8 to 16 hours to recharge the tank depending on tank size.”

Oh BS.

Honda sells their home unit for $4900, not $10k. Chessapeake has been working with GE to get one out for $500, not $10k. Good freaking grief.

Yeah, it takes a while to fill up at your home, but it’s a FULL TANK. What do you think people are doing? Standing in their garage all night waiting for the tank to fill? What else is your car doing at night that it can’t be refilled? Does your gasoline car have a 100% full tank every morning?

Every time someone posts about NG vehicles, a few start posting the most hyperbolic “facts,” rivaled only by anti-fracking nut jobs.


69 posted on 10/17/2013 8:01:26 AM PDT by cizinec ("Brother, your best friend ain't your Momma, it's the Field Artillery.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: babygene
The article was about “CNG” not “LNG”.

The post I was responding to was LNG, not CNG.

70 posted on 10/17/2013 8:03:55 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: thackney

First of all, this article lost me at “Chevrolet” - I’m not buying ANY Government Motors car so long as Uncle owns a single share or has a single board member. However, I did rent one earlier this year, so I’ll comment about it even if I won’t ever buy one.

The 2014 Impala with a 3.6 liter, 305 hp engine will do 0-60 in 6.7 seconds, a quarter mile in 15.0 at nearly 94 mph, and can get 28 mpg on the highway. Combined with an 18.5 gallon tank, that’s a range of 518 miles. Having driven a 2013 (which is essentially the same car), I can verify that it has excellent acceleration - nearly as good as my ‘69 GTO. I also got about 30 mpg on the road at 65, though I admit it fell “a bit” when I was testing its torque curve out.

The only thing new about this car is the CNG option - which is a good one, mind you, if you can actually find any of the stuff. I suspect it’ll become more available over time, but the performance is nothing better than at present with a “mere” gasoline engine.

Oh, and Chevy is supposed to come out with a nearly 200-horse, 4-cylinder later this year that will likely get at least 2-3 mpg better.

Of course, if the assholes would produce a diesel hybrid for a car like this they could get 40 mpg in the city and on the highway, and you’d have a car with lots of leg room and trunk space, plus tons of torque to make it a fun car (especially with the flexibility of a 6-speed transmission).


71 posted on 10/17/2013 8:05:31 AM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

There are business even setting up manufacturing here in the USA because the cost of production, electricity and raw materials are cheaper because of the plentiful natural gas

The Governor of Colorado Mr. Chickenpooper has added a $2B tax to the rural electric producers and added layers of “Green” and “Global Warming” regulations on rural communities. Coal prices are skyrocketing as the EPA restriction and mine closures.


72 posted on 10/17/2013 8:08:08 AM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana
It's a step in the right direction.

What most are forgetting in this article that it's a multifuel car with natural gas.
You run out of regular gas ? push the button and run it off of natural gas, you run out of natural gas ? push the button and run it off of regular gas.
At least we would have thought ? that they put in a warning that either tanks are running out and need to switch over seamlessly so you don't run out on a busy road or highway.
73 posted on 10/17/2013 8:09:18 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
Crumple zones, remember the Ford Pinto ? ran off of gasoline.
Most cars today have the gas tank behind the trunk pan.
Most accidents are either head on or T-Bone, or side wipes.
There is a inherent risk to everything.

Look at the wheel wells in a trunk of a car in relation to the truck pan and quarter panels.
Modular smaller tanks can be placed on top of the wheel wells.
Put the spare tires under the hoods if there is room like the Volts Wagon and use the spare tire ares for the tanks.
Ever look behind the panels inside of a car's interior on a 2 door car or coupe ? ... empty wasted space where they could place the car's computer, or other components that aren't dangerous to the passengers to make room up front for the spare tire.
They are even forging metal panels today to fix a battery in the trunk on cars.
They can forge stamp metal panels in the car's trunk to accommodate a natural gas tank set into the space horizontally and then place a truck board over it to place baggage or other things in the trunk.
They need to rethink of where things are placed in a car.
Does the car's computer have to be under the hood ?
On some cars with the computer under the air cleaner it takes up a lot of space.
Does the car's battery have to be under the hood ? or engine bay ?
Back in the 30s, 40s they have the battery in a lot of cars under the right passenger's feet..... they just need to forge stamp the metal panels to accommodate that.
On front wheel drive cars ? why the hump in the middle in the floor panel ? design and then forge stamp a place in that area to accommodate a battery.
74 posted on 10/17/2013 8:27:41 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
Did you know that most car's gas tanks are right under or near the rear passenger's seats right in front of the trunk pan in front of the bump where the spare tire goes ? .... check it out and take a look for your self, you will be surprised.

75 posted on 10/17/2013 8:33:21 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

Oh yeah I remember the Pinto.
Square pistons.
(Okay, “oblong”.. but still.)

Yes, they do need ot rethink how they do things.
But, the NTSC/highway safety mongers probably will want their two cents/pond of flesh in there.

The Delorean had an interesting frame I haven’t seen anywhereelse that could be used in a fashion like you describe, the frame is a box frame, shaped like a double ended tuning fork.
Apply “wet wing” tech to the frame, and you have extra fuel space.

But.. The highway safety commitee will want their say in anything.


76 posted on 10/17/2013 8:34:01 AM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free..... Even robots will kill for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr
" I suspect it’ll become more available over time, but the performance is nothing better than at present with a “mere” gasoline engine. "

People also forget the lost of performance in their cars when they are forced to buy the cheaper gas over the premium gas because they can't afford it.

77 posted on 10/17/2013 8:36:36 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Natural gas powered vehicles have been around for decades as well as the technology for transporting and safely filling tanks. The US has an abundance of natural gas and left to the market natural gas powered vehicles could easily become a popular alternative to gasoline. However, I would expect that the government and environmentalists will muck things up and force us to use more ethanol and electric powered cars that survive in the market only because of massive government subsidies.


78 posted on 10/17/2013 8:36:48 AM PDT by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion

Consider the state, Colorado


79 posted on 10/17/2013 8:38:38 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Back when I had my Jetta diesel (750+ miles/tank), I worked with a guy who had one too, and he had added am auxiliary 30 gallon tank in the trunk. He could drive from Connecticut practically to the Rocky Mountains on a single fill up.


80 posted on 10/17/2013 8:39:53 AM PDT by Jack of all Trades (Hold your face to the light, even though for the moment you do not see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson