Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreedomPoster

It’s a link to Online WSJ that requires log in so I can’t read the whole story.

My gut tells me that this ‘fee’ is just another revenue stream for government. Nothing in what is freely visible in the excerpt tells me HOW they will combat the potential fraud. For instance, how will that fee be used? Will it be used to verify eligibility? Will it go to the vendor? To some nondescript fund that gets used up for other things?

I need more information before I’d say good or bad.


27 posted on 10/18/2013 3:24:30 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Gaffer

The point here is that people will be less likely to have multiple phones that they sell to others if they have to shell out $5/mo. It’s not about how the revenue is used, it’s about discouraging fraud.


28 posted on 10/18/2013 3:26:55 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson