“Laws.We don’t need no stinkin’ laws”.....Holder/Obama
“tick tock.... tick tock.... “
No problem. Court will rule that Obamacare should apply to all 50 states. Problem goes away.
“tick tock.... tick tock.... “
No problem. Court will rule that Obamacare should apply to all 50 states. Problem goes away.
SNAOU = Situation normal all Obama’d UP.
SNAWWU = Situation normal all Wee Wee’d Up.
Since when has a court opinion deterred this pathetic little diktator?
Meh. John Roberts will again pull something out of his ass to affirm the law.
Why do we have to rely on the UK press to get these stories?
LOL...so those stupid GOP governors who jumped on Obama’s broken down gravy train will have subjected their people to these penalties, while the 37 smart governors will have provided exemptions for their states. Nice going, chumps.
Perhaps that's why we haven't heard of thousands having their policies canceled in Louisiana and Texas, like those who live in Floriduh and other states have...
Supreme Court: Obama is Kaliph. There are no States, only the Obama Kaliphate.
Think I’m joking?
How high up is this federal judge?
A review of internal architectural diagrams obtained by the AP revealed the system's complexity. Insurance applicants have a host of personal information verified, including income and immigration status. The system connects to other federal computer networks, including ones at the Social Security Administration, IRS, Veterans Administration, Office of Personnel Management and the Peace Corps.".......... Insiders who worked on US health website describe high stress, complaints about major problems
What part of a dictatorship do you not recognize? Whatever the judge says means nothing to the idiots in DC. They will do what they want to. Osluma is now saying the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction over him or his actions.
enough of this lawyerly bs,
Get a rope.
Earlier:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3081909/posts
A federal judge will decide Tuesday on a case that could blow a major hole through the Obamacare exchanges when he rules on whether the government can dole out tax credits to Americans whose states declined to run their own Affordable Care Act insurance markets.
U.S. District Court Judge Paul L. Friedman heard oral arguments Monday and said he would rule Tuesday morning on the challenge by seven plaintiffs, who want an injunction from the rule that extends credits to all of the exchanges. He will also rule on the governments attempt to kill the lawsuit.
The 2010 law says the tax credits go to help Americans enrolled in exchanges established by the state. But about three dozen states declined to create their own exchanges, leaving it to the federal government to step in and opening up the question of whether residents in those states can still get the subsidies.
They are asking you to interpret north to mean south, the plaintiffs attorney, Michael A. Carvin, told Judge Friedman.
Justice Department lawyer Joel L. McElvain argued that Congress did not want to favor some states over others through the health care law. Instead, he said the Department of Health and Human Services was poised to stand in the shoes of those states that decided to let the federal government run their insurance portals.
The case takes a nuanced look at legislative intent, but the stakes could not be broader for Mr. Obamas signature domestic achievement.
Yanking away subsidies from about three dozen states that decided not to set up exchanges on their own would make joining the markets less attractive. Coming on the heels of serious glitches on the exchanges online portals, such a ruling would be another dent.
Attorneys from both sidesand even Judge Friedman himselfsaid the case is likely to climb the judicial ladder.......
If the court throws 0bamacare out will the left agree and say the court settled it just move on like they were saying after the 1st decision....really? I just typed that...of course they won't.
I've been arguing that point for awhile now here on FR!!!