Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Administration Caught in New Obamacare Dilemma (Husseincare meets Hussein's sequester)
Heritage ^ | 10/25/13 | Amy Payne

Posted on 10/25/2013 5:07:08 PM PDT by Libloather

Remember sequestration? Those automatic budget cuts that went into effect when Congress failed to do real budgeting a couple of years ago? It’s hitting Obamacare now.

Both laws have been around for awhile, but the Obama Administration hasn’t done anything to prepare for their collision.

The cuts are hitting a set of subsidies that were supposed to help pay deductibles and co-pays for lower-income Americans with Obamacare coverage. An Obama official pledged there would be a plan before the Obamacare exchanges opened on October 1, but that didn’t happen.

(Excerpt) Read more at blog.heritage.org ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hussein; husseincare; obamacare; sequester
I bet Hussein faints this time.
1 posted on 10/25/2013 5:07:08 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Oh what a tangled web we weave,
When first we practice to deceive!

Sir Walter Scott, Marmion, Canto vi. Stanza 17.
Scottish author & novelist (1771 - 1832)


2 posted on 10/25/2013 5:10:35 PM PDT by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

he’ll just suspend it.

he’s suspending any law he doesn’t like now.


3 posted on 10/25/2013 5:14:48 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Sequestration forever!


4 posted on 10/25/2013 5:26:06 PM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Presidential executive dictate (formerly: order).

Memo to insurance companies: "Eat it. Or else. Love, Bo..."

5 posted on 10/25/2013 5:29:04 PM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
If you've been wondering why Harry Reid has said that eliminating the sequester was the major objective of the budget negotiations assigned to the conference committee headed by Sen Patty Murray and Cong Paul Ryan, now you know.

No "grand bargain". Not even a "small bargain".

Harry intimated the choice for Republicans was either a.) dump the sequester or b.) the 'Rats would shut down the government...and blame it on Republican intransigence again.

Ryan's head, of course, is full of "Grand Bargain" sugar plums. It seems to have become a perverse obsession of his.

Would he give up the sequester -- avoiding yet another Obamacare embarrassment -- in return for a promise to open negotiations on a "Grand Bargain"?

Gawd, I hope not...

6 posted on 10/25/2013 5:37:16 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson