He knows he has zero credibility with the world as the morally bankrupt sociopath that he is. And now as he continues being impugned, marginalized as the duplicitous, sinister megalomaniac he's been outed to be, he believes he's somehow going to redeem himself with these laughably transparent gestures convincing anyone that he's some sort of man of principle, of conviction to throw out how he's considering banning such activity. It's as patently embarrassing as when it was claimed he knew nothing about the spying.
It points out the utter sense of insecurity, lack of anything he himself believes him to watch as he flounders like some sea creature on the deck of a fishing trawler.
Having him "consider" banning such activity for allied nations as a result of a deepening diplomatic crisis,there doesn't seem to be the same sort of moral conflict regarding the surveillance, spying on American citizens.
Shouldn't Americans be privy to the same sort of privilege as that of foreign countries' heads of state?
1 posted on
10/28/2013 9:15:52 PM PDT by
lbryce
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: lbryce
Always pulling the wrong conclusion from any incident. Amazing!
2 posted on
10/28/2013 9:17:40 PM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(Ted Cruz/Sarah Palin 2016)
To: lbryce
3 posted on
10/28/2013 9:19:52 PM PDT by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: lbryce
But, Obama does not know who our allies are.
4 posted on
10/28/2013 9:20:20 PM PDT by
Slyfox
(Satan's goal is to rub out the image of God he sees in the face of every human.)
To: lbryce
5 posted on
10/28/2013 9:22:01 PM PDT by
GeronL
To: lbryce
No one can make this stuff up! Hillaryous!
6 posted on
10/28/2013 9:22:24 PM PDT by
Rembrandt
(Part of the 51% who pay Federal taxes)
To: lbryce
He should maybe make it illegal to smuggle machine-guns to narco kingpins...?
7 posted on
10/28/2013 9:23:22 PM PDT by
gaijin
To: lbryce
He’ll redouble his efforts with American citizens instead.
9 posted on
10/28/2013 9:25:03 PM PDT by
headstamp 2
(What would Scooby do?)
To: lbryce
A propaganda story put out by Obama. Again, Obama is surprised by the disclosure of NSA spying, which he learned about only recently. He is the outsider not responsible for anything. He hopes the world leaders will love him again.
Just as was the case with the Obamacare rollout, Obama is more angry and upset about this than anyone else. He will make sure that it is corrected and these damned bureaucrats are reined in.
10 posted on
10/28/2013 9:25:05 PM PDT by
kabar
To: lbryce
Yea, like there is any semblance of credibility there.
He can ban it all day long if he wants. That ends with the election of another President. Congress can’t even pass a law against it and have it upheld. So who cares, it’s just another liberal Platitude.
11 posted on
10/28/2013 9:25:09 PM PDT by
Usagi_yo
To: lbryce
He should make it illegal to use the IRS as a partisan bludgeoning tool before a tight election.
Yeah.
12 posted on
10/28/2013 9:25:11 PM PDT by
gaijin
To: lbryce
So when he said the spies were Mossad, he was lying?
If he’s spinning much faster now, he’ll fly away. To Iran.
13 posted on
10/28/2013 9:25:35 PM PDT by
Hardraade
(http://junipersec.wordpress.com/2013/10/04/nicolae-hussein-obama/)
To: lbryce
He should make it illegal to stand in front of a polling station in combat boots, slapping a trucheon into a gloved fist.
Mmm-hmm.
15 posted on
10/28/2013 9:27:11 PM PDT by
gaijin
To: lbryce
In a statement on Monday, Ms. Feinstein, chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said, I do not believe the United States should be collecting phone calls or emails of friendly presidents and prime ministers. The question is, just who does obama and company consider "friendly" and who do they consider "not friendly."
As a law abiding citizen I'd like the same consideration as friendly foreign heads of state: don't spy on me! I don't have anything to hide, but the lack of trust it suggests is insulting. There's also the 4th Amendment:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
17 posted on
10/28/2013 9:28:42 PM PDT by
ThunderSleeps
(Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
To: lbryce
I hope these same nations have been spying on him. Turnabout is fair play.
19 posted on
10/28/2013 9:33:58 PM PDT by
ChocChipCookie
("Demons run when a good man goes to war.")
To: lbryce
Wait. ‘MAY ban...’?
If this were Bush, Left would demand Impeachment - “Now!”
20 posted on
10/28/2013 9:34:44 PM PDT by
4Liberty
(Some on our "Roads & Bridges" head to the beach. Others head to their offices, farms, libraries....)
To: lbryce
Yeah, like enhanced interrogation. Everything is appearance with Obama. He will say it is banned, outlawed but that doesn’t make it so.
21 posted on
10/28/2013 9:35:10 PM PDT by
Irenic
(The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheel barrow)
To: lbryce
Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.
24 posted on
10/28/2013 9:45:02 PM PDT by
iowamark
(I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy)
To: lbryce
26 posted on
10/28/2013 9:51:06 PM PDT by
Charles Martel
(Endeavor to persevere...)
To: lbryce
In a statement on Monday, Ms. Feinstein, chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said, I do not believe the United States should be collecting phone calls or emails of friendly presidents and prime ministers.
It's good to see the US continue to lead the way for other nations - while the other governments of the world quaintly continue to spy on each other, our government boldly renounces this outdated 20th century practice and forges ahead with the less costly, more efficient innovation of spying on it's own citizens.
Not only is spying on US citizens easier than spying on foreign heads of state, it also consumes less fuel for foreign trips, thereby making it sexy, sustainable "green" spying, certified by the EPA not to endanger polar bears.
To: lbryce
My, yes, he "may" ban spying on other members of the international elite or he "may" not, but we must all understand that no such tiny tremor of conscience will be coming
our way in that regard. My, no.
Time, I think, to shut the NSA down completely. I am aware of its value as a clearing-house for intelligence. In a sane government it would be that, ethically run, or at least as close to it as feasible. In an ignorant, arrogant, power-hungry and abusive government, it is a fantastically dangerous object. Weigh the value against the abuse. In a sane time, the value obviously would be greater. In an abusive time, the price is too great to pay.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson