Posted on 11/04/2013 4:22:43 AM PST by Kaslin
The presidential election of 2016 will be a defining moment for the nation and for the Republican Party.
Not so for the Democratic Party. There’s no controversy among Democrats about what America should be and what their party is about. Big government, welfare state socialism, and secular humanism.
The only question about who the Democratic presidential candidate will be is which welfare state socialist, secular humanist they will nominate.
The picture for Republicans is more complex and this makes Democrats happy. They see Republican Party intraparty dissension as division and weakness which, in their view, can only help Democrats.
Key issues divide Republicans both about principles – what is America about? – and political strategy – what are the best tactics for electing candidates and advancing the party agenda?
So let me say who I see as the Republican “dream team” ticket for 2016 – Senator Ted Cruz and Dr. Ben Carson.
Yes, I can hear Democrats saying “Oh yes, I hope Star is right. This will guarantee another four years of our big government socialism. These Tea Party whackos could never win.”
And I can hear the Republican “establishment” saying basically the same thing (any chance these folks have more in common with Democrats than they do with real conservatives?).
Both political parties are being hammered now in the polls, but Republicans more than Democrats. And among Republicans, the Tea Party is really being hammered.
So how can I seriously say that a real conservative, Tea Party ticket is both the answer for the Republican Party and the country?
First, starting out by looking at polls is exactly the formula for political failure.
Apple co-founder and famed technology entrepreneur Steve Jobs is widely quoted for his disdain for market research. Jobs’ point was that leaders and entrepreneurs don’t start by asking people what they want and trying to give it to them. Visionaries see what the problems are that need to be solved and they deliver solutions that customers are not aware of or never dreamed of.
Political leadership is no different than business leadership in this regard. Polls reflect yesterday. Leadership reflects tomorrow.
What is the relevant information we should be looking at today?
We should be looking at the ongoing dismal performance of the American economy and we should be looking at the ongoing dismal state and breakdown of the American family.
The polling data we should look at are the data showing the deep dissatisfaction Americans feel about the state of the country, its direction, and the uniformly low trust that Americans feel toward their government and political leaders.
It’s time for Americans to have a real choice. We know what the Democratic Party is going to put on the table for them.
A Cruz Carson ticket would give Americans a clear, no-nonsense and honest alternative. Two Americans who are really committed to what America is about and what made it great. Traditional values, limited government, free markets, and a strong national allegiance and defense.
And, of course, given the sweeping demographic changes of the country, it can’t hurt to hear this from two self-made Americans – one of Spanish-speaking roots (Cruz’s father immigrated from Castro’s Cuba) and one African American raised in a ghetto in Detroit.
Both are living examples that personal success is not about government programs but about taking personal responsibility for one’s life. That freedom is about creating and serving not about claiming and taking. And neither have interest in political game playing.
Ironically, the Tea Party was born when Obamacare came to life. Now, as the Obamacare disaster unfolds before us, Americans are starting to understand what the Tea Party saw then.
We shouldn’t be trying to drag the Tea Party back into the amorphous masses. We need the Tea Party out front to lead.
I don’t see a more powerful team to do this than Cruz Carson.
Carson is pro-amnesty
Hmmmmmmmmmmm.
No.
I would go for that.
It's too early to choose anyone. One thing, for sure. I want someone who's a proven winner for constitutional conservatives, stands by Ted Cruz, and can lead and win elections, and has done so.
And don't come to me with because Ted Cruz was born in Canada. I got a news flash for you. Ted Cruz's mother was a natural born US Citizen when she gave birth to her son
...and meanwhile the rats are putting in place their mechanisms to cheat to win.
first thing, right out of the barrel...... a self righteousist whines about the lack of Christ like conservative purity.
You got Obama elected.
Well Jay, How would you like a Ted Cruz/Dr. Ben Carson ticket?
posted on November 1, 2013 11:30:24 PM MDT by G Larry
Well, first of all, he has to want to run. Second the nominee can choose who he wants for his running mate, and that person can accept or decline
I don’t think that’s necessarily true this time.
Cruz has a big bump so far.
Let’s keep defending him. He’s got real good exposure thus far.
George Romney was born in Mexico and was allowed to run for Pres in ‘68, so precsedent already set way before Obama
Col. West has exec experience.
I could also go for that.
On the McLaughlin group yesterday Chris Matthews and Eleanor Clift were put off the Cruz is not eligible argument by John (WRONG!) McLaughlin
They both said Cruz was too radical, but if they liked him it would not be good
We have to always recall that the other side is not about what’s good for the country and they will hate. And they’re probably worse than ever
Ben Carson is nice, but, no.
Agreed. We don’t want Dr. Carson ending up like Herman Cain, gaining a lot of support until skeletons come out of the closet.
First of all, George Romney lost the nomination, but secondly, and more important, there is nobody who can "allow" or "not allow" someone to "run for President".
In fact, in the Constitution, there's no such thing as "running for President" (except in the incredibly poorly drafted XXII Amendment).
ANYBODY can "run for President". In fact, I believe that an Elector for President or Vice President can VOTE for anyone he likes, including a non-NBC, a ten year old, a resident of Indonesia, etc.
Someone who has RUN AND BEEN ELECTED but who is not QUALIFIED cannot be inaugurated and cannot exercise the powers of the office, but the sole judge and guardian of THAT is Congress, and, as with so many other of their functions, they have abdicated.
Top seats to Conservatives is a great idea. However, without ligislative support, they are mere figureheads, for the most part.
Real change will require veto proof majorities in Congress, coupled with a will to change the course of this republic.
I like Carson’s stances on Obamacare, but he seems rather unvetted on other pertinent issues. If he’s anything less than pro-2nd Amendment, he’s a non-starter for me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.