Skip to comments.
UC-Berkeley Students Ban Use of ‘Illegal Immigrant’
national review ^
Posted on 11/09/2013 11:00:53 AM PST by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
To: Sub-Driver
Cal-Berkeley talking apes.
To: Sub-Driver
I guess wetback is out too.
That leaves “undocumented democrats.”
22
posted on
11/09/2013 11:39:19 AM PST
by
Bubba_Leroy
(The Obamanation Continues)
To: Sub-Driver
Meanwhile terms like “honky” and “whitey” are OK.
I guess the Left only cares if some people are “de-humanized”.
To: Sub-Driver
I plan to ramp up my use of the term “illegal alien.”
24
posted on
11/09/2013 11:49:38 AM PST
by
Menehune56
("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
To: Sub-Driver
how do they refer to the current occupant of our White House, then?
To: Sub-Driver
The I word is legally inaccurate since being out of status is a civil rather than criminal infraction, the resolution reads. How is violating National boundaries (via invasion, or trespassing) not a criminal infraction?
All Nations protect their boundaries - except for apparently the United States which is not allowed to do so. The world-wide communist movement has deemed the United States as belonging to the world. Our Government also refuses to uphold the Constitution and protect our boundaries - a dereliction of duty that belongs to both political parties.
26
posted on
11/09/2013 12:09:25 PM PST
by
El Cid
(Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
To: Sub-Driver
This from the home of the free speech movement ;)
27
posted on
11/09/2013 12:11:58 PM PST
by
prov1813man
(While the one you despise and ridicule works to protect you, those you embrace work to destroy you)
To: Menehune56
It is good to know that laws don’t apply anymore. We already know they don’t apply to DemocRATS.
Lefties are adept at Lying, Cheating and Stealing. When they come by your yard where you are growing your food, after the collapse make sure they show their vote card and party affiliation.
28
posted on
11/09/2013 12:12:45 PM PST
by
stubernx98
(cranky, but reasonable)
To: Sub-Driver
Wait a sec, when did Janet deport anyone? Did I miss that action on her part??
Freakin lying scum. ILLEGALS, that’s what I’ll call them, like it or not.
29
posted on
11/09/2013 12:41:09 PM PST
by
AllAmericanGirl44
('Hey citizen, what's in YOUR closet?')
To: Sub-Driver; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Impy; GOPsterinMA; randita; Sun; LdSentinal; ...
While they're at it, they should ban the use of the term “drug dealer,” it's very insensitive and judgmental. Instead, call them “unlicensed pharmacists.”
30
posted on
11/09/2013 1:55:45 PM PST
by
Clintonfatigued
(The War on Drugs is Big Government statism)
To: Sub-Driver
The alternate term, “foreign nationals” isn’t bad at all. They aren’t Americans.
To: nuconvert
Can’t say the I word? Obama uses it all the time!
Liberals did away with English grammar. Now they’re doing away with vocabulary. What’s next?
32
posted on
11/09/2013 2:28:43 PM PST
by
abclily
To: JohnBrowdie
Technically they're correct. They are not illegal, but if you want precision the word criminal should be used.
Reference: 8 U.S.C. § 1325.
To: Sub-Driver
I agree. It should be “criminal trespassers”.
34
posted on
11/09/2013 4:01:07 PM PST
by
TangoLimaSierra
(To win the country back, we need to be as mean as the Libs say we are.)
To: Sub-Driver
To: mountainlion
Your ancestor wasn't illegal, he came per the backing and authority of the Church to escape persacution. Others came later per the authority and backing of British royal law.
What they found here were stone age people who didn't even know what a wheel was. A slightly different situation than
Mexicans and other nationals crossing into this country
without legal authorization.
To: Sub-Driver
The adults (if there are any) at UC are letting the children run the house? No surprise there...
37
posted on
11/10/2013 7:58:34 AM PST
by
DennisR
(Look around - God gives countless, indisputable clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson