Clinton followed the rule of law. He did not pander to the minority community and set a very bad precedent. What's the problem?
Here’s the problem.
President Reagan fought the system and kept the legal process going until a teenage boy from the Ukraine was allowed to remain in the USA.
This boy, Walter Polovchak, now 44 has two sons, ages 18 and 9, and lives with his family in Des Plaines.
Much nicer ending. It’s called Freedom.
Lets compare this to the days of slavery before the civil war. Lets say a female slave decides to try to make her escape to one of the free states. She brings her child with her. About half way through her journey, she dies but her child makes it the rest of the way to freedom.
Then the father, still residing in the slave state as a slave, of the child demands that the child is returned to his custody where the child will be a slave too. Do you return the child to the father.
Troll.
B.S. Utter B.S. The US Govt in fact interfered in a lawful custody arrangement, sending gun-toting thugs to take the child at gunpoint and return him to Cuba. They were not willing to follow due process, they admitted as much. The case for paternal custody was too weak to fly in the federal courts. The feds were bound by law against interference in a case under adjudication. So they mooted due process at the point of a gun.
Didn't we later on find a number of Cuban agents hanging out in the Justice and State Departments?