Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Duh!
1 posted on 11/30/2013 12:34:27 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

Without Sarah, he would have been laughed into conceding by July.


2 posted on 11/30/2013 12:36:01 PM PST by knarf (I say things that are true .. I have no proof .. but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I guarantee you the only reason I voted for that doddering old man is because I believed Matt Damon’s view about actuarial tables and hoped Sarah would simply ascend...after a sad and regretful state funeral...


3 posted on 11/30/2013 12:38:53 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The big difference is that with Sarah, McCain was able to come in second. If Palin had not been on the ticket, McCain would have come in last.


4 posted on 11/30/2013 12:38:54 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The most troubling aspect of all of this is that it is more than likely that Obama would have lost the 2008 election if Sarah Palin had been at the top of the GOP Ticket.

Palin-McCain would have won in a landslide.

That was the huge mistake the GOP establishment made at the 2008 convention.


6 posted on 11/30/2013 12:42:51 PM PST by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I posted here right after the election that had Sarah NOT been on the ticket McLame would have lost by an additional 20 million votes. OK a little hype there but I could believe 5-10 million less. He was a disaster and I surely would not have voted for him. Any one even remember when they floated ‘TOM RIDGE!?????


7 posted on 11/30/2013 12:44:08 PM PST by Doc Savage ("I've shot people I like a lot more,...for a lot less!" Raylan Givins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Because Joe Biden is SUCH a much smarter and honorable person than Sarah. < /BULLSTALIN >


8 posted on 11/30/2013 12:46:05 PM PST by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The facts have never gotten in the way of the MSM writing a hit piece of the right. The problem is that the e-GOP either believes it or chooses to lose rather than give up being RINOs.


16 posted on 11/30/2013 12:56:19 PM PST by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Palin scared the heck out of Obama because of her appeal to Walmart moms . If she’d had free reign to run her side of the campaign, she would have forced Obama into even more errors and revealed his nastiness and lack of cool (”lipstick on a pig;” “fish wrap”) in unpredictable ways. Mc Cain’s suspending the campaign took that off the rails.


17 posted on 11/30/2013 12:56:19 PM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I voted for Sarah Palin. What’s his name, that dim-witted RINO, just happened to be taking up space on the ballot.


19 posted on 11/30/2013 12:58:22 PM PST by Standing Wolf (No tyrant should ever be allowed to die of natural causes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

John Who????

Palin got my vote some jerk was along for the ride


20 posted on 11/30/2013 12:59:58 PM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I loathed McCain and was determined that he was going to be the first GOP candidate in my life that I refused to vote for. The selection of Palin changed that in a split-second, and I cast my vote (for HER) with a level of enthusiasm that I had not experienced since the days of Ronald Reagan.


21 posted on 11/30/2013 1:03:56 PM PST by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

A study wasn’t necessary. It was obvious to anyone with a brain paying attention that it was only as close as it was because of Palin. McCain got about 60-million votes. 10-million of those voters wouldn’t have crossed the street to shake his hand. They voted for Palin. Without her, McCain gets a Mondale type beating.


22 posted on 11/30/2013 1:05:37 PM PST by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

She brought 20 points to the table, I don’t care what anyone says.

My state GOP coordinator echos the sentiment that because of her, McCain lost 20 points.

He lost 20 points, because he was campaigning for Hussein.

He did everything he could to throw the race.

He was a palooka, plain and simple.


23 posted on 11/30/2013 1:05:51 PM PST by esoxmagnum (Turtles don't win fights, they just turtle up. Victory belongs to the aggressor, not the turtle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I am not at all surprised by this, as hubby and I voted for Palin -— not McCain. He just happened to be on the ballot with her.


28 posted on 11/30/2013 1:41:28 PM PST by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
  I remember talking to liberals who were impressed with Palin during the campaign. As I recall, McCain's chances looked very good until he made the idiotic decision to "suspend" his campaign so that he could concentrate on the financial crisis. I knew it was over the very moment he made the announcement about suspending the campaign.
31 posted on 11/30/2013 1:45:07 PM PST by Maurice Tift (Never wear anything that panics the cat. -- P.J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KC_Lion; onyx; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ...

Thanks 2ndDivisionVet.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3094063/posts?page=55#55


38 posted on 11/30/2013 2:13:32 PM PST by SunkenCiv (http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Out of the four people on the 2008 ticket, Sarah Palin was the only one who was reasonably sane, and the only one reasonably qualified to be President.


40 posted on 11/30/2013 2:36:12 PM PST by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I was voting for Sarah.

I would vote for her again.

If anything, I am even more impressed with her now than in 2008. No matter what filth gets thrown her way, she maintains her high class and dignity; you know this is a decent, thoughtful human being. Her message has not changed.

Compared to Palin's presentation of herself and her message, Barack Obama looks like a fifth rate carnival huckster. You know he's lying. You know she is not.
45 posted on 11/30/2013 3:38:19 PM PST by Nepeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I did not vote for John McCain in 2008. I voted for Sarah Palin. It’s not my fault McCain was also on the ticket.


46 posted on 11/30/2013 3:39:55 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Dude! Where's my health insurance policy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Duh is right. One can easily envision the dimensions
of McCain’s historic loss without Mrs. Palin.
An Obama mandate would have been claimed, it was any
way.


47 posted on 11/30/2013 3:40:16 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson