It would have to be evaluated against custom at the time and place in question. Let’s be honest about frauds.
I could take it as supporting a thesis otherwise proven.
And, again, I think Barry’s as fraudulent as they come.
But because some clerk in HI typed a work that wasn’t supported in a government process manual over 50 years ago?
Just seems like pretty tepid evidence to have to base any kind of case on, let alone one of this stature.