Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Florida Becomes Third State to Pre-File
Convention of States ^ | DECEMBER 10, 2013

Posted on 12/11/2013 5:43:15 PM PST by dontreadthis

Good news from the Sunshine State! Florida State Senator Alan Hays (R-Umatilla) filed SM 476 on Friday petitioning Congress to call an Article V Convention of States.

Senator Hays stated, “Everywhere I go, people ask me what can be done to reform Washington, D.C. This petition to Congress to convene the Article V convention is the first step toward that reform. This ‘runaway’ Federal government is of great concern to Americans of all political parties and of all the states.”

In filing the legislation, Senator Hays continued, “In their wisdom, our Founders knew the Federal Government might one day become too large and too powerful, so they specifically inserted a mechanism that gives states a lawful and orderly instrument to restrain a runaway federal government; it’s Article V, Section 2 of the Constitution.”

So far, Florida, Virginia, and South Carolina have officially pre-filed our application in their state legislature. We have many more representatives interested in sponsoring our application, so be looking for your state as we announce more pre-filings in the next few weeks!

These are huge steps towards calling a Convention of States, and we’re taking them right on schedule!


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; US: Florida; US: South Carolina; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: articev; florida; southcarolina; virginia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
ARTICLE V PING!!!!!!!!
1 posted on 12/11/2013 5:43:15 PM PST by dontreadthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis
Hate to be a fuddy dud, but wouldn't we need 38 states to move on this?

If I'm mistaken, please correct me. I can't count 38 red states...can y'all?

2 posted on 12/11/2013 5:47:48 PM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

I would like to have the capital moved to “Inhospitable, Wyoming” to start with.


3 posted on 12/11/2013 5:51:14 PM PST by donmeaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis
Who in the nazi government of the U.S. has any regard for the Constitution, amended or not?

It's going to take more than a Constitutional Convention.....

4 posted on 12/11/2013 5:51:45 PM PST by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

They say be careful what you wish for...


5 posted on 12/11/2013 5:52:01 PM PST by donmeaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

No, 34 needed to call the COS. That is, 34 to get together and formulate amendments.

THEN, and only then, are 38 needed to ratify. States ratifying need not have attended the COS.


6 posted on 12/11/2013 5:52:06 PM PST by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis; Travis McGee

Be careful what you ask for ConCon ping!


7 posted on 12/11/2013 5:53:14 PM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

REALLY BAD, BAD IDEA.

There is a better, MUCH SAFER way to do this.

The BEST way to reign in these CRIMINALS, is simply to repeal the 17th amendment.

(Which “progressives” and other “statist” criminals forced through, counting on the ignorance of the population at large.)

Crap would change over night.

If you don’t understand this post, you don’t understand how this Republic was constructed.

Don’t mean to be arrogant, but I DO mean for everyone to THINK, and then figure out what I have just posted, on their own.


8 posted on 12/11/2013 5:53:41 PM PST by ConradofMontferrat ( According to mudslimz, my handle is a HATE CRIME. And I HOPE they don't like it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stboz

If we had enough right minded people, we wouldn’t need a Constitutional Convention.

What we need is a bit more fail, so that the fedgov is more discredited, and people get educated to become right minded. Barak Obama is just what we need.


9 posted on 12/11/2013 5:53:45 PM PST by donmeaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777
I can name 50 states that chafe under an oppressive, consolidated government in Washington, DC.
10 posted on 12/11/2013 5:54:12 PM PST by Jacquerie (An Article V Amendment Convention is our only hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stboz

The COS is not a Constitutional Convention. The US has had only one of those, and probably will never have another one.

In the scenario of a CW-II, THEN after that finishes, from the ashes, perhaps a Constitutional Convention might arise. More likely, IMHO, would be anarchy and/or dictatorship.

In the meantime, we have the COS. It is Constitutional by definition, and has the SOLE purpose of formulating and proposing amendments for possible ratification.


11 posted on 12/11/2013 5:54:57 PM PST by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Baynative; Jacquerie

ping a ling


12 posted on 12/11/2013 5:55:35 PM PST by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

how many states would agree on term limits, just take a guess


13 posted on 12/11/2013 5:58:47 PM PST by dontreadthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
“I would like to have the capital moved to “Inhospitable, Wyoming” to start with.”

That would be a sacrilege! Leave it where it is, Detroit on the Potomac!

14 posted on 12/11/2013 6:02:35 PM PST by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis
Lots of states would agree. The folks that would NOT agree are the targets, that is, Federal office holders such as Sinators and Congresscritters. However, they don't get to vote. States (legislators) do. What aspiring young STATE legislator wouldn't want to limit the incumbants in DC to the extent that it makes it more feasible for that STATE legislator to possibly move up the ladder to a federal seat?
15 posted on 12/11/2013 6:02:49 PM PST by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ConradofMontferrat

there are only 2 ways to repeal the 17th Amendment, and one of those ways is never going to happen. The other way is what this is all about.


16 posted on 12/11/2013 6:03:01 PM PST by dontreadthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: dontreadthis

Think what the free sh*t army (which twice elected obama) could do with this...


18 posted on 12/11/2013 6:03:28 PM PST by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

Texas?


19 posted on 12/11/2013 6:03:41 PM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

if that’s an honest guess, then you should be posting on the Succession thread


20 posted on 12/11/2013 6:05:55 PM PST by dontreadthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson