They're not just being encouraged. The British police service now has an official head scarf for their female officers:
UK: Avon and Somerset Police force creates Islamic headscarf for women officers entering mosques
Posted on 12/17/2013 10:17:50 AM PST by Impala64ssa
Whitechapel is on the outskirts of London, but it is an area where Muslims enforce Sharia law without any interference from British officials. On Saturday, they took it a step further and told shop owners in the area they will face 40 lashes if they continue to sell alcohol.
The protesters, including Anjem Choudary, the former leader of the Al-Muhajiroun group which was banned under terrorism laws, delivered warning letters to Muslim-owned businesses. “The shops are run by Muslims and they know they are selling alcohol and they know the sale and consumption of alcohol is completely prohibited,” he said. “We cannot live among the non-Muslims and see this evil take place.”
Mizanur Rahman, organiser of the protest, said it had urged business owners to stop selling alcohol in breach of Muslim laws.
Mr Rahman said: “We want Sharia law to be enforced in Britain,” before adding that many of the Muslim owners had been “embarrassed and ashamed” when confronted about their alcohol sales, but had argued that it was an economic necessity.
In 2011, The Daily Mail did an exposé on these "Muslim patrols" and how the English government has not done anything to stop. Women are targeted if they do not wear a headscarf.
An Asian woman who works in a pharmacy in east London was told to dress more modestly and wear a veil or the shop would be boycotted. When she went to the media to talk about the abuse she suffered, a man later entered the pharmacy and told her: 'If you keep doing these things, we are going to kill you'.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
There are parts of Minneapolis that are very Somali dominated. Dearborn is sometimes referred to as “Dearbornistan.” There was recently an issue with the local police chasing Christians away from a local event because they were...Christians.
It’s not as bad as Whitehall, Laon France, or Malmo Sweden. Not yet, anyway...but neither were those places, once upon a time...
Let’s see what would happen if they tried something, say, in NYC???
They're not just being encouraged. The British police service now has an official head scarf for their female officers:
UK: Avon and Somerset Police force creates Islamic headscarf for women officers entering mosques
Liberal Multiculturalism at its worst! ...assimilation not required.
Coming to a city near you! ..if not already there.
Armed civilians wouldn’t have to put up with this crap. Islamists could walk in with their whips, and go out in body bags, the way it should be.
“You're a naughty one Saucy Jack
You're a haughty one Saucy Jack
When the streetlamp gaslight flickers and fails
Then you see the last light glinting off the entrails
Oh naughty naughty naughty
You're a sneaky one Saucy Jack
You're a cheeky one Saucy Jack
First the whore says “Guv’nor fancy a squeeze?”
Next you will be shov’in her down the hole to Hades
Oh naughty naughty naughty
The scourge of London Town
(The scourge of London Town)
There’ll be no rest ‘til
You are a guest of The Crown
Naughty naughty naughty
You're a ghoulish one Saucy Jack
Not a foolish one Saucy Jack
Though the peelers track you early and late
Slipping out the back you counter with a checkmate”
Only filthy lash-weilding muslims making threats instead of whores.
...Whores are about 57 notches higher on the morality scale than a muslim that threatens shop owners, by the way.
A whore has a much better chance of escaping Hell also...
1—The bobbies on the street don’t carry guns en masse because the British public and the police do not want an all armed police force. Guns are carried by specialist armed units. Its not that the average bobby is ‘banned’ from it, they simply don’t carry.
2—UK policewomen do not wear headdress in Muslim areas, they DO wear headdress if entering a mosque, as its a place of worship and its a mark of respect. Just as they remove their headgear when entering a Christian, Jewish or other religious shrine/temple/place of worship.
3—Rigby murder. I am sick of the British public being bashed for not doing anything to stop the murder. The fact is that they ran him down, and then hacked him to death, all within 60-90 secs. By the time people realised what was going on, the poor lad was dead. Looked at sensibly, there is little or nothing ANY public could have done in the short time of the assault to have saved his life.
I know Americans love to tell us how they’d have pulled out their ol’ trusty 45 and shot the two, but frankly that’s post murder BS. America has its famous cases of murder where many heard and saw and nobody did a thing.
The Brits haven’t outlawed guns. Getting so very tired of correcting this myth.
Your post is more correct than a previous entry on this issue.
Now wait just a minute! Let’s not rush to things. WE want our way with these scum BEFORE they get to hell.
Let’s not forget those who would stand with them.
The Brits haven’t outlawed guns. Getting so very tired of correcting this myth.
While technically true the method for obtaining one is onerous as well as the continuous process of keeping it.
http://www.marplerifleandpistolclub.org.uk/general/gunlaw.htm
And there have been many published accounts of people using their legal weapons to defend themselves being prosecuted for attempted murder or murder. Thank you no, if it quacks like a duck call it what it is.
http://www.marplerifleandpistolclub.org.uk/general/gunlaw.htm
This may be something that will wake the Brits. Don’t mess with their booze.
A few decades ago my mother and I were in London (She was British, naturalized American). We got off our bus and found ourselves walking through what was obviously an Eastern neighborhood. My radar kicked into action. No women on the street other than us. Men sitting or walking on the sidewalk, looking askance at us in a way that was very uncomfortable and threatening. I kept us move along briskly, to say the least.
Crowd Control 101, ala Col. Rex Applegate.
‘And there have been many published accounts of people using their legal weapons to defend themselves being prosecuted for attempted murder or murder. Thank you no, if it quacks like a duck call it what it is.’
Actually that also a myth, one which has been discussed at length here. There have only been a tiny amount of UK houseowners charged and/or found guilty of using excessive force. I myself was the victim of a burglary-assault in late 2008 where I used reasonable violence to subdue the attacker. And got stabbed in the hand for my pains (pardon the pun).
(NaturalNews) There is a saying - in the U.S., anyway - that a “man’s house is his castle.” That saying can carry a host of meanings, not the least of which is that a man’s home is his sacred sanctuary and it cannot be violated by anyone.
But that’s here in the United States, where political correctness in the legal system hasn’t quite reached the level it has in our cousin country, Great Britain.
There, defending your home can land you in jail, while the trespasser criminal is allowed, in some cases, to get off scot-free.
A report in the Daily Telegraph provided a glimpse into this topsy-turvy, upside-down legal precedent.
In one recent incident, a farm tenant and his wife, both of whom had suffered a number of break-ins already, were arrested and jailed after using a legally-owned firearm (not an easy thing to obtain in the gun-free zone of England) to shoot at and wound one of two burglars who surprised the couple in the night.
But wait. The outrage gets worse.
Multiple robberies, but that doesn’t seem to matter
According to reports, the husband used his weapon to fire at the intruders, who then fled the isolated farmhouse before calling police.
Yes, that’s right: Both of the burglars were shot and wounded, and one of them actually called the cops. But he must’ve known what he was doing because his victim got arrested for nothing more than defending his home.
“This is not the first time they have been broken into,” said the arrested man’s mother, in comments to the paper. “They have been robbed three or four times. One of them was quite nasty.”
The mother went on to say the couple has never been injured during the series of robberies, but obviously they were “marked” as an “easy score” by the local thugs, and it might only have been just a matter of time before “quite nasty” turned, literally, into something quite nasty. Victims are never empowered; only criminals who are allowed to operate unchallenged are empowered.
Other farmers in the area chimed in as well. They, too, have been victimized.
“We had three Land Rovers stolen,” one told the paper. “We had fitted one with a tracker and it was recovered in Birmingham.”
In the case of the farm tenant, four men - the two who were wounded and two others suspected of taking part - were indeed arrested, but the victim and his wife were also charged. According to the Telegraph, the victimized couple was booked on “suspicion of causing grievous bodily harm.”
Defend your home, go to jail
Without question, the case is likely to reignite a debate within Great Britain about a homeowner’s right to defend his property, the paper said. That debate initially began in the late 1990s after another farmer, Tony Martin, shot two burglars at his remote home. Martin shot at Brendan Fearon, 29, and Fred Barras, 16, after they broke into his home.
He fired three times. Barras was struck in the back and although he managed to eventually escape through a window, he died moments later. Martin, meanwhile, was convicted of murder and sentenced to life in prison, which was later reduced to manslaughter and five years in prison. Nice of the court to cut him a break.
In 2009, millionaire businessman Munir Hussain fought back against a knife-wielding intruder with a metal pole and cricket bat; the burglar had tied up his family at their Buckinghamshire home.
For daring to defend himself and his family, Hussain was jailed for more than two years, though his attacker was spared prison.
Lucky for Hussain he eventually got an understanding judge who reduced his sentence to one year in jail, which was suspended.
What a guy.
Sources:
http://www.naturalnews.com/034537_NDAA_Bill_of_Rights_Obama.html
More myths for ya.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.